Raymond Fong

Raymond Fong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 86.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Raymond Fong has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	7 cases	21% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 21% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	6 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arms Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raymond Fong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Raymond Fong has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	43% of cases	Public Prosecutor v. Thiruselvan: Abetment of Cannabis Trafficking(Oct 2000) PP v Abdul Salam: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Common Intention(Sep 2000) PP v Sim Teck Ho: Trafficking of Diamorphine & Presumption Under Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2000)
Public Prosecutor	3 cases	43% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Seah Kok Meng: Murder Charge for Death Outside Nikmath Restaurant(Feb 2001) PP v Chandrasekaran: Attempted Murder & Theft at Chinese Garden(Nov 2000) Public Prosecutor v Tay Chin Wah: Arms Offences Act - Discharging Revolver and Intention to Cause Injury(Feb 2000)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	1 cases	14% of cases	Yap Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug Trafficking Conviction Under Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Raymond Fong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	14%
Won	62.0 parties avg	2.0	86%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	52.4 parties avg	2.4
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Raymond Fong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	6(86%)	86%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	5 14	Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yap Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug Trafficking Conviction Under Misuse of Drugs Act 16 Oct 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Oct 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction was affirmed.
2	Public Prosecutor v Seah Kok Meng: Murder Charge for Death Outside Nikmath Restaurant 04 Feb 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Feb 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted on the charge of murder.
3	PP v Chandrasekaran: Attempted Murder & Theft at Chinese Garden 14 Nov 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	14 Nov 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was convicted on both charges. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Public Prosecutor v. Thiruselvan: Abetment of Cannabis Trafficking 03 Oct 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Oct 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused.
5	PP v Abdul Salam: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Common Intention 06 Sep 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	06 Sep 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Partial SuccessConviction of the second and third accused, but acquittal of the first accused.
6	PP v Sim Teck Ho: Trafficking of Diamorphine & Presumption Under Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Apr 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	21 Apr 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty as charged.
7	Public Prosecutor v Tay Chin Wah: Arms Offences Act - Discharging Revolver and Intention to Cause Injury 25 Feb 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	25 Feb 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused.