Reshma Nair

Reshma Nair is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Reshma Nair has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and winding up.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Economic Duress	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Securities and Futures Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commodity Trading	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Reshma Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Reshma Nair has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	4 cases	80% of cases	Perennial v Capitol: Winding Up Application Based on Just and Equitable Ground(Feb 2018) Goh Bee Lan v Yap Soon Guan: Summary Judgment & Economic Duress in Loan Agreement Restructuring(Jan 2018) Perennial (Capitol) v Capitol Investment: Winding Up Based on 'Just and Equitable' Ground(Apr 2017)
Herbert Smith Freehills	1 cases	20% of cases	FIC Properties v PT Rajawali: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Fraud, Illegality, Natural Justice(Dec 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Reshma Nair's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	16.0 parties avg	6.0	20%
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	20%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2018	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Reshma Nair's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(20%)	20%
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,250,000.00	812,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	FIC Properties v PT Rajawali: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Fraud, Illegality, Natural Justice 15 Dec 2024 FIC Properties Sdn Bhd (Claimant, Defendant)Won	15 Dec 2024	FIC Properties Sdn Bhd (Claimant, Defendant): Applications dismissedThe Rajawalis' applications to set aside the Second Award and the Enforcement Order were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Perennial v Capitol: Winding Up Application Based on Just and Equitable Ground 25 Feb 2018 New Capitol Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	25 Feb 2018	New Capitol Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed as the court found that the just and equitable ground for winding up had not been made out.
3	Goh Bee Lan v Yap Soon Guan: Summary Judgment & Economic Duress in Loan Agreement Restructuring 17 Jan 2018 Goh Bee Lan (Plaintiff)Won	17 Jan 2018	Goh Bee Lan (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffSummary judgment granted to the Plaintiff for the sum of $3.25 million, together with interest of 5.33% per annum and costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Perennial (Capitol) v Capitol Investment: Winding Up Based on 'Just and Equitable' Ground 16 Apr 2017 New Capitol Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	16 Apr 2017	New Capitol Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedApplication to wind up Capitol Investment Holdings Pte Ltd dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Vintage Bullion DMCC v Chay Fook Yuen: Statutory Trust, Liquidation & Customer Claims 01 Aug 2016 VINTAGE BULLION DMCC (Appellant)Partial	01 Aug 2016	VINTAGE BULLION DMCC (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part in relation to the sum segregated in the Customer Segregated Accounts to cover the Forward Value arising out of the LFX and Bullion transactions for the Customers on the basis that a statutory trust has been imposed on the said sum. Costs of the proceedings below should be paid out of the liquidation estate on a standard basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).