Rethnam Chandra Mohan

Rethnam Chandra Mohan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnership	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Principles	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rethnam Chandra Mohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rethnam Chandra Mohan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	4 cases	80% of cases	Nicky Tan v Metax Eco Solutions: Estate Costs Rule & Liquidators' Duties(Mar 2021) Kathryn Ma v Trillion Investment: Derivative Action, Directors' Duties & Companies Act(Apr 2020) Ma Wai Fong Kathryn v Trillion Investment: Winding Up on Just and Equitable Grounds(Mar 2019)
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Vita Life Sciences v Arthur Andersen: Offer to Settle & Costs Dispute(Jun 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rethnam Chandra Mohan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 5 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	20%
Won	34.3 parties avg	4.3	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rethnam Chandra Mohan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nicky Tan v Metax Eco Solutions: Estate Costs Rule & Liquidators' Duties 02 Mar 2021 Metax Eco Solutions Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	02 Mar 2021	Metax Eco Solutions Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed due to settlement not disclosed to the court. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Kathryn Ma v Trillion Investment: Derivative Action, Directors' Duties & Companies Act 27 Apr 2020 Kathryn Ma Wai Fong (Plaintiff)Won	27 Apr 2020	Kathryn Ma Wai Fong (Plaintiff): Leave grantedLeave was granted to the plaintiff to bring an action on behalf of Trillion against the directors for breach of duties.
3	Ma Wai Fong Kathryn v Trillion Investment: Winding Up on Just and Equitable Grounds 19 Mar 2019 Kathryn Ma Wai Fong (Appellant)Partial	19 Mar 2019	Kathryn Ma Wai Fong (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in respect of Double Ace Trading Company (Private) Limited, but dismissed in respect of Trillion Investment Pte Ltd.
4	Petroships Investment v. Wealthplus: Derivative Action, Liquidation, and Minority Shareholder Rights 20 Mar 2016 MEGACITY INVESTMENT PTE LTD (Respondent, Defendant)Won	20 Mar 2016	MEGACITY INVESTMENT PTE LTD (Respondent, Defendant): Favorable RulingThe appeal against Megacity Investment Pte Ltd was dismissed.
5	Vita Life Sciences v Arthur Andersen: Offer to Settle & Costs Dispute 08 Jun 2008 Arthur Andersen (Defendant)Lost	08 Jun 2008	Arthur Andersen (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendant's application for costs was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.