Richard Lam

Richard Lam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and employment law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Richard Lam has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and employment law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Richard Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Richard Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Richard Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Richard Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Richard Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Richard Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Richard Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Richard Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Richard Lam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Partnership	1 cases	100% of cases	Vandashima v Tiong Sing Lean: Breach of Employment Contract & Fiduciary Duty(Jul 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Richard Lam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Richard Lam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Vandashima v Tiong Sing Lean: Breach of Employment Contract & Fiduciary Duty 27 Jul 2006 PT Vandashima Indonesia (Plaintiff)Neutral	27 Jul 2006	PT Vandashima Indonesia (Plaintiff): NeutralThe second plaintiff did not have the capacity to sue the first defendant in any event as the first defendant was never in its employment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.