Richard Tan

Richard Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and building and construction law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Richard Tan has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Delay in completion	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Defective Works	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Richard Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Richard Tan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Chin Hoe & Co	1 cases	33% of cases	Kay Lim v Soon Douglas: Implied Terms, Indemnity Clauses & Crane Dismantling Negligence(Sep 2012)
Lee & Lee	1 cases	33% of cases	Anwar Siraj v Ting Kang Chung: Challenge to Arbitrator's Impartiality and Competence in Construction Dispute(Mar 2003)
Straits Law Practice LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Jurong Readymix Concrete v Crescendas: Defective Concrete & Premature Formwork Removal Dispute(Apr 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Richard Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	33.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Richard Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	247,856.34	123,928.172 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kay Lim v Soon Douglas: Implied Terms, Indemnity Clauses & Crane Dismantling Negligence 09 Sep 2012 Kay Lim Construction & Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	09 Sep 2012	Kay Lim Construction & Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the registrar. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Jurong Readymix Concrete v Crescendas: Defective Concrete & Premature Formwork Removal Dispute 06 Apr 2005 Jurong Readymix Concrete Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	06 Apr 2005	Jurong Readymix Concrete Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff on its claim for $247,856.34 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the writ to the date of judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Anwar Siraj v Ting Kang Chung: Challenge to Arbitrator's Impartiality and Competence in Construction Dispute 23 Mar 2003 Ting Kang Chung (Respondent)Won	23 Mar 2003	Ting Kang Chung (Respondent): Costs AwardedApplicants ordered to pay 90% of the total costs to the arbitrator. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.