Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe

Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Adjudication	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Defects	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Security of Payment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Product Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fire Damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Electronic Engineering	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
David Lim & Partners LLP	5 cases	83% of cases	The Enterprise Fund III Ltd v CNPLaw LLP: Negligence Claim Against Lawyers for Flawed Loan Facility Agreement(Dec 2023) Lou Kan v Li Hua: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages in Investment Loss(Oct 2021) OOPA Pte Ltd v Bui Sy Phong: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Corporate Opportunity(Jun 2021)
David Lim & Partners	1 cases	17% of cases	Sato Kogyo v Socomec: Negligence Claim for Fire Damage Due to Defective UPS System(Apr 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	33%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Richard Yeoh Kar Hoe's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Won	4(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,281,490.00	256,298.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	The Enterprise Fund III Ltd v CNPLaw LLP: Negligence Claim Against Lawyers for Flawed Loan Facility Agreement 06 Dec 2023 Value Monetization III Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	06 Dec 2023	Value Monetization III Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe Lenders’ claim against CNP was dismissed.
2	Lou Kan v Li Hua: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages in Investment Loss 14 Oct 2021 Li Hua (Defendant)Lost	14 Oct 2021	Li Hua (Defendant): Claim AllowedClaim allowed against Li Hua for S$1,275,490 with interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of issue of the writ. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	OOPA Pte Ltd v Bui Sy Phong: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Corporate Opportunity 15 Jun 2021 OOPA Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	15 Jun 2021	OOPA Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff. The court declared that Bui received, held and continues to hold the shares registered in his name in Telio for the benefit of and on trust for OOPA, order that he transfer the same to OOPA and account for dividends (if any) derived from the shares to date. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	LH Aluminium v Newcon: Security of Payment Act Adjudication Dispute 27 Nov 2014 LH Aluminium Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	27 Nov 2014	LH Aluminium Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the Plaintiff. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	LH Aluminium v Newcon: Premature Adjudication, Repeat Claims, and Settlement Agreements in Construction Dispute 27 May 2014 LH Aluminium Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 May 2014	LH Aluminium Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe defendant's application was dismissed, and costs of $6,000 plus reasonable disbursements were awarded to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Sato Kogyo v Socomec: Negligence Claim for Fire Damage Due to Defective UPS System 10 Apr 2012 Socomec SA (Defendant)Won	10 Apr 2012	Socomec SA (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; plaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.