Robert Tay

Robert Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and fraud and deceit. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Robert Tay has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in bankruptcy and corporate law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Bankruptcy	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Robert Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Robert Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Robert Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Robert Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Robert Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Robert Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Robert Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Robert Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Tort of Conspiracy to Defraud	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Robert Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Robert Tay has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah and Tann	1 cases	100% of cases	Yap Jeffery Henry v Seow Timothy: Conspiracy to Defraud & Breach of Companies Act(Jan 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Robert Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	100%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Robert Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yap Jeffery Henry v Seow Timothy: Conspiracy to Defraud & Breach of Companies Act 17 Jan 2006 Lim Kim Soon (Defendant)Neutral	17 Jan 2006	Lim Kim Soon (Defendant): NeutralThe fifth defendant must bear his own costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.