Robin Teo

Robin Teo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and minority oppression. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Robin Teo has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equitable Lien	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Purchaser's Lien	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholding Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Robin Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Robin Teo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Ng Kian Huan v Suying: Minority Oppression & Director Duties(Mar 2019) PACC Offshore Services v Kensteel Engineering: Equitable Lien & Caveat Dispute in Property Sale(May 2017) Lee Hung Pin v Lim Bee Lian: Unwinding Winding Up Due to Procedural Irregularities and Company Matters(Jun 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Robin Teo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Robin Teo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Kian Huan v Suying: Minority Oppression & Director Duties 04 Mar 2019 Suying Design Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	04 Mar 2019	Suying Design Pte Ltd (Defendant): Various payments orderedVarious payments ordered (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	PACC Offshore Services v Kensteel Engineering: Equitable Lien & Caveat Dispute in Property Sale 14 May 2017 PACC Offshore Services Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	14 May 2017	PACC Offshore Services Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff): Caveat to remain unless the defendant is able to provide an alternative form of securityThe court ordered that the caveat remain in place pending the outcome of Suit 898, unless the defendant provides security for the plaintiff's claim for the return of the deposit in the amount of $4,066,000.
3	Lee Hung Pin v Lim Bee Lian: Unwinding Winding Up Due to Procedural Irregularities and Company Matters 30 Jun 2015 Lee Hung Pin (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Jun 2015	Lee Hung Pin (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application to unwind the winding up of the company was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.