Roderick E Martin

Roderick E Martin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and civil practice. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Roderick E Martin has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	18% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Roderick E Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Roderick E Martin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Martin & Partners	2 cases	67% of cases	AmBank v Raymond Yong: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment and Bankruptcy Application(Nov 2007) Ong Pang Wee v Chiltern Park: Transfer of Proceedings from Magistrate's Court to High Court(Mar 2003)
Martin and Partners	1 cases	33% of cases	Tokuhon v Seow: Directors' Fiduciary Duties & Termination of Distributorship(Oct 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Roderick E Martin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Roderick E Martin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AmBank v Raymond Yong: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment and Bankruptcy Application 20 Nov 2007 Raymond Yong Kim Yoong (Respondent, Appellant)Won	20 Nov 2007	Raymond Yong Kim Yoong (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the Assistant Registrar's decision was allowed, with costs to the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tokuhon v Seow: Directors' Fiduciary Duties & Termination of Distributorship 06 Oct 2003 Tokuhon (Pte) Ltd (Appellant)Lost	06 Oct 2003	Tokuhon (Pte) Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ong Pang Wee v Chiltern Park: Transfer of Proceedings from Magistrate's Court to High Court 12 Mar 2003 Ong Pang Wee (Appellant)Lost	12 Mar 2003	Ong Pang Wee (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.