Roderick Edward Martin

Roderick Edward Martin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and construction law. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated expertise across 47 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy Chapter 13	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Money Laundering	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Attendance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Doctor's Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Altered Consent Form	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tower Crane Rental	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roderick Edward Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Roderick Edward Martin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Martin & Partners	4 cases	80% of cases	Li Siu Lun v Looi Kok Poh: Gleneagles Hospital Conspiracy & Damages Assessment(Nov 2013) Ang Jeanette v PP: Money Laundering Conviction Appeal under CDSA(Apr 2011) Kimly Construction v Lee Tong Boon: Tower Crane Collapse & Breach of Contract(Jan 2011)
RHTLaw Asia LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Pleadings, Rules of Court, Witness Attendance(Jul 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Roderick Edward Martin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	60%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Roderick Edward Martin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	250,000.00	62,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Pleadings, Rules of Court, Witness Attendance 15 Jul 2020 CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant)Lost	15 Jul 2020	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant): Application deniedDefendant's arguments against providing further particulars and bifurcating the trial were rejected. Costs to be assessed if not agreed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Li Siu Lun v Looi Kok Poh: Gleneagles Hospital Conspiracy & Damages Assessment 13 Nov 2013 Li Siu Lun (Plaintiff)Won	13 Nov 2013	Li Siu Lun (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; compensatory damages of $10,000 and aggravated damages of $240,000 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ang Jeanette v PP: Money Laundering Conviction Appeal under CDSA 25 Apr 2011 Ang Jeanette (Appellant)Lost	25 Apr 2011	Ang Jeanette (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
4	Kimly Construction v Lee Tong Boon: Tower Crane Collapse & Breach of Contract 27 Jan 2011 Lee Tong Boon trading as Rango Machinery Services (Defendant)Lost	27 Jan 2011	Lee Tong Boon trading as Rango Machinery Services (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the defendant. Liable to the plaintiff for damages.
5	AmBank v Yong Kim Yoong: Enforceability of Foreign Judgments & Bankruptcy Proceedings 21 Jan 2009 Yong Kim Yoong Raymond (Respondent)Won	21 Jan 2009	Yong Kim Yoong Raymond (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs against the appellant.