Roderick Martin

Roderick Martin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and torts. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Roderick Martin has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Strata Management Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Preferential Payments	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roderick Martin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Roderick Martin has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Martin and Partners	2 cases	50% of cases	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Stay of Bankruptcy Proceedings Due to Liquidator's Action(Nov 2005) Rahenah bte L Mande v Baxter Healthcare: Workmen's Compensation Act & Starting Action for Damages(Aug 2002)
RHTLaw Asia LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Breach of Contract, Specific Performance & Termination(Jun 2021)
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Anthony Ma v Yap Sing Lee: Defamation Claim Among Condo Residents(Feb 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Roderick Martin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.1
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Stayed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Won	28.3 parties avg	8.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Roderick Martin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Stayed	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	200,000.00	66,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Stayed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Breach of Contract, Specific Performance & Termination 13 Jun 2021 CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	13 Jun 2021	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Anthony Ma v Yap Sing Lee: Defamation Claim Among Condo Residents 05 Feb 2018 Lo Shiaw Choon (Appellant)Won	05 Feb 2018	Lo Shiaw Choon (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; not liable for defamation.
3	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Stay of Bankruptcy Proceedings Due to Liquidator's Action 13 Nov 2005 Tang Yoke Kheng (Debtor, Respondent)Stayed	13 Nov 2005	Tang Yoke Kheng (Debtor, Respondent): Bankruptcy proceedings stayedBankruptcy proceedings stayed pending the outcome of the liquidator’s claim against Lek and Lim, conditional on payment of $200,000 into court. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
4	Rahenah bte L Mande v Baxter Healthcare: Workmen's Compensation Act & Starting Action for Damages 20 Aug 2002 Baxter Healthcare Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	20 Aug 2002	Baxter Healthcare Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed in favor of the defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD (Singapore Dollar) is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.