Roderick Martin SC

Roderick Martin SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and judgments and orders. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Default Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract of service	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roderick Martin SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Roderick Martin SC has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
RHTLaw Asia LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	Uday Mehra v L Capital: Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy(Jan 2022) CIE v CIF: Setting Aside Portions of Arbitration Award for Breach of Contract(Jan 2021)
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Aircraft Purchase Agreement Dispute(Apr 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Roderick Martin SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Roderick Martin SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Uday Mehra v L Capital: Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy 27 Jan 2022 Uday Mehra (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Jan 2022	Uday Mehra (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedAll claims made by the plaintiff were dismissed.
2	CIE v CIF: Setting Aside Portions of Arbitration Award for Breach of Contract 25 Jan 2021 CIE (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Jan 2021	CIE (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe Claimant's application to set aside portions of the arbitration award was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Singapore Airlines v CSDS Aircraft: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Aircraft Purchase Agreement Dispute 29 Apr 2019 CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant)Won	29 Apr 2019	CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc (Defendant): Default judgment set asideThe defendant's application to set aside the default judgment was allowed.