Rodney Keong

Rodney Keong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and bankruptcy. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rodney Keong has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Management Corporation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defective Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rodney Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rodney Keong has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bih Li & Lee	4 cases	50% of cases	Management Corp v Goodview: Strata Titles, Management Corp Action on Behalf of Some Subsidiary Proprietors(Oct 2000) Low Hua Kin v Kumagai-Zenecon: Director's Breach of Duty & Provisional Liquidator's Sale of Shares(Jul 2000) Chua Choon Lim Robert v MN Swami: Striking Out, Abuse of Process & Limitation Act(Jul 2000)
Rodyk and Davidson	3 cases	38% of cases	Rasmachayana Sulistyo v The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corp: Bankruptcy & Service of Statutory Demand(Dec 2004) Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG v C K Tang Ltd: Breach of Contract in Securitisation Transaction(Nov 2004) HSBC v Rasmachayana Sulistyo: Bankruptcy Order & Service of Statutory Demand(Oct 2004)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	13% of cases	Wong Sau Kuen v Wong Kai Wah: Dispute over Committee Appointment under Mental Disorders and Treatment Act(Jan 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rodney Keong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	38%
Partial	26.2 parties avg	6.2	25%
Won	34.7 parties avg	4.7	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	44.3 parties avg	4.3
2004	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rodney Keong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Partial	2(25%)	25%
Won	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	275,000.00	34,375.008 cases	8

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2004	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wong Sau Kuen v Wong Kai Wah: Dispute over Committee Appointment under Mental Disorders and Treatment Act 08 Jan 2008 Wong Suan Fong (Plaintiff)Partial	08 Jan 2008	Wong Suan Fong (Plaintiff): Application granted in partApplication granted in part; the 2nd to 5th Plaintiffs and the 2nd Defendant be made members of the Committee with parties at liberty to apply should circumstances change in the future. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Rasmachayana Sulistyo v The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corp: Bankruptcy & Service of Statutory Demand 29 Dec 2004 Rasmachayana Sulistyo (alias Chang Whe Ming) (Appellant, Debtor)Lost	29 Dec 2004	Rasmachayana Sulistyo (alias Chang Whe Ming) (Appellant, Debtor): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court found no meritorious grounds to resist the bankruptcy petitions. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG v C K Tang Ltd: Breach of Contract in Securitisation Transaction 17 Nov 2004 Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG (Plaintiff)Partial	17 Nov 2004	Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentJudgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $275,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	HSBC v Rasmachayana Sulistyo: Bankruptcy Order & Service of Statutory Demand 03 Oct 2004 Rasmachayana Sulistyo (alias Chang Whe Ming) (Debtor)Lost	03 Oct 2004	Rasmachayana Sulistyo (alias Chang Whe Ming) (Debtor): Bankruptcy order madeBankruptcy order made against Rasmachayana Sulistyo. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Management Corp v Goodview: Strata Titles, Management Corp Action on Behalf of Some Subsidiary Proprietors 08 Oct 2000 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1938 (Appellant)Won	08 Oct 2000	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1938 (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs awarded to the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Low Hua Kin v Kumagai-Zenecon: Director's Breach of Duty & Provisional Liquidator's Sale of Shares 27 Jul 2000 Kumagai-Zenecon Construction Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent)Won	27 Jul 2000	Kumagai-Zenecon Construction Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. No monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Chua Choon Lim Robert v MN Swami: Striking Out, Abuse of Process & Limitation Act 18 Jul 2000 Former agency manager of the company (Defendant, Respondent)Won	18 Jul 2000	Former agency manager of the company (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantThe plaintiff's action against the fourth defendant was dismissed as being also vexatious and an abuse of the process of the court. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	MCST Plan No 1938 v Goodview Properties: Strata Titles, Management Corporation & Defective Common Property 27 Apr 2000 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1938 (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	27 Apr 2000	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1938 (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $4,000 to be paid to the defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).