Roger Foo

Roger Foo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in banking law and fiduciary duties. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Roger Foo has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and banking law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roger Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Roger Foo has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Genesis Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Panpac Education v Applied Movers: Sub-Lease Extension, Rental Obligations & Reinstatement Costs Dispute(Mar 2014)
Helen Yeo & Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	Banque Nationale de Paris v Hew Keong Chan Gary: Accessory Liability & Unauthorized Transactions(Nov 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Roger Foo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Roger Foo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	72,186.05	36,093.032 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Panpac Education v Applied Movers: Sub-Lease Extension, Rental Obligations & Reinstatement Costs Dispute 19 Mar 2014 Panpac Education Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	19 Mar 2014	Panpac Education Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in part, leave to defend granted in partJudgment was entered for the plaintiff for $72,186.05 with interest and costs. The defendant was granted unconditional leave to defend the claim for reinstatement costs but upheld the AR’s order of conditional leave for the balance of rent unpaid (this amounted to $152,154). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Banque Nationale de Paris v Hew Keong Chan Gary: Accessory Liability & Unauthorized Transactions 19 Nov 2000 Banque Nationale de Paris (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Nov 2000	Banque Nationale de Paris (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against all defendants was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.