Rohan Harith

Rohan Harith is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and conspiracy by unlawful means. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rohan Harith has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in minority oppression and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Minority Oppression	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Rohan Harith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Rohan Harith has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Rohan Harith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rohan Harith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rohan Harith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rohan Harith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rohan Harith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rohan Harith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rohan Harith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rohan Harith has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Pricing Mechanism	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rohan Harith has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rohan Harith has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rohan Harith has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rohan Harith has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok	3 cases	100% of cases	Dixon v Scanlon: Share Valuation Dispute & Interpretation of Court Orders(Mar 2007) Raiffeisen Zentralbank v Archer Daniels Midland: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy Claim(Oct 2006) Hoban Steven Maurice Dixon v Scanlon Graeme John: Valuation of Minority Shares in Oppression Claim(Jul 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rohan Harith's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.2
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	35.2 parties avg	5.2	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2007	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rohan Harith's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Dixon v Scanlon: Share Valuation Dispute & Interpretation of Court Orders 20 Mar 2007 Vivaldi Investments Ltd (Appellant)Lost	20 Mar 2007	Vivaldi Investments Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the trial judge’s decision not to adjust the nil valuation of the subject shares was dismissed.
2	Raiffeisen Zentralbank v Archer Daniels Midland: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy Claim 31 Oct 2006 Raiffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG (Plaintiff)Lost	31 Oct 2006	Raiffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action was dismissed with costs to be taxed unless agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Hoban Steven Maurice Dixon v Scanlon Graeme John: Valuation of Minority Shares in Oppression Claim 30 Jul 2006 Vivaldi Investments Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Jul 2006	Vivaldi Investments Ltd (Plaintiff): Invitation to vary the expert’s valuation dismissedThe court dismissed the plaintiffs’ invitation to vary the expert’s valuation. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.