Rokiah Pillay

Rokiah Pillay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in banking law and credit and security. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rokiah Pillay has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking law and credit and security.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rokiah Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rokiah Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rokiah Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rokiah Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rokiah Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Caveatable Interest	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rokiah Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Lodgment	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rokiah Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Equitable Mortgages	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rokiah Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rokiah Pillay has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Tan and Molly Lim LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Ho Soo Fong v Standard Chartered Bank: Equitable Mortgages & Wrongful Caveat Lodgment(Nov 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rokiah Pillay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rokiah Pillay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ho Soo Fong v Standard Chartered Bank: Equitable Mortgages & Wrongful Caveat Lodgment 17 Nov 2004 Lin Siew Khim (Plaintiff)Won	17 Nov 2004	Lin Siew Khim (Plaintiff): Applications allowedThe court allowed the application and directed an inquiry by the Registrar as to whether any and, if so, what damages were sustained that were attributable to the refusal or failure to withdraw the caveats when requested to do so between 21 October 2002 and 30 June 2004.