Roslina Baba

Roslina Baba is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Roslina Baba has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and undue influence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Roslina Baba has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roslina Baba has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roslina Baba has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Roslina Baba has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roslina Baba has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Roslina Baba has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roslina Baba has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wills	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roslina Baba has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roslina Baba has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roslina Baba has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Non-Competition Clause	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roslina Baba has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roslina Baba has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roslina Baba has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Roslina Baba has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ramdas & Wong	3 cases	100% of cases	Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Duress, Undue Influence & Deed of Settlement Dispute(Jun 2006) Kamla Lal Hiranand v Lal Hiranand: Summons in Chambers, Consent Order & Originating Summons Dispute(Aug 2003) Barang Barang Pte Ltd v Boey Ng San: Non-Competition Clause & Summary Judgment(May 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Roslina Baba's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Roslina Baba's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	2,000,000.00	2,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Duress, Undue Influence & Deed of Settlement Dispute 05 Jun 2006 Kamla Lal Hiranand (Defendant)Won	05 Jun 2006	Kamla Lal Hiranand (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendant's counterclaim for a declaration that the 1999 deed was valid and binding on the plaintiff and for specific performance thereof was allowed. The court also allowed her counterclaim for all necessary accounts and inquiries to be taken of all the property and assets of MHR’s estate and that the plaintiff pay her 25% of the assets of the said estate. Her final counterclaim for the payment to her of US$2m under cl 4 of the 1999 deed was also allowed although it should be subsumed under the prayer for specific performance, anyway. Assumed USD, as the judgment refers to amounts in USD.
2	Kamla Lal Hiranand v Lal Hiranand: Summons in Chambers, Consent Order & Originating Summons Dispute 07 Aug 2003 Kamla Lal Hiranand (m.w.) (Plaintiff)Dismissed	07 Aug 2003	Kamla Lal Hiranand (m.w.) (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application by way of Summons-in-Chambers No 601562 of 2002 was dismissed.
3	Barang Barang Pte Ltd v Boey Ng San: Non-Competition Clause & Summary Judgment 05 May 2002 Second defendant (Defendant)Won	05 May 2002	Second defendant (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication against the defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.