Roslina Bte Baba

Roslina Bte Baba is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and landlord and tenant law. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Roslina Bte Baba has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	19% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Roslina Bte Baba has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 19% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Roslina Bte Baba has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roslina Bte Baba has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roslina Bte Baba has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roslina Bte Baba has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Settlement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roslina Bte Baba has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roslina Bte Baba has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roslina Bte Baba has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Roslina Bte Baba has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roslina Bte Baba has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roslina Bte Baba has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of clause in deed	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roslina Bte Baba has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roslina Bte Baba has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Roslina Bte Baba has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ramdas & Wong	2 cases	67% of cases	JTC Corp v Chin Hong Printing: Summary Judgment for Vacant Possession in Lease Dispute(Jun 2014) Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Contractual Terms, Specific Performance & Interpretation of Deed(Jan 2007)
Ramdas and Wong	1 cases	33% of cases	Burby v Koo Khin Yong: Breach of Contract & Investment Dispute(Sep 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Roslina Bte Baba's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Roslina Bte Baba's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	JTC Corp v Chin Hong Printing: Summary Judgment for Vacant Possession in Lease Dispute 12 Jun 2014 JTC Corp (Plaintiff)Won	12 Jun 2014	JTC Corp (Plaintiff): Final judgment for vacant possessionFinal judgment to plaintiff for defendant to deliver vacant possession of the premises; damages and interests to be assessed. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Contractual Terms, Specific Performance & Interpretation of Deed 28 Jan 2007 Kamla Lal Hiranand (Respondent)Lost	28 Jan 2007	Kamla Lal Hiranand (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, with costs to the appellant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Burby v Koo Khin Yong: Breach of Contract & Investment Dispute 02 Sep 2004 Pengiran Anak Hajah Damit (Defendant)Won	02 Sep 2004	Pengiran Anak Hajah Damit (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant prevailed as the plaintiff's claim was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.