Rowena Chew Kiat

Rowena Chew Kiat is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in documentary credits and letters of credit.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in estoppel and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Estoppel	2 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Customer Confidentiality	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Curial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rowena Chew Kiat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rowena Chew Kiat has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bih Li & Lee	2 cases	100% of cases	Credit Agricole Indosuez v Banque Nationale de Paris: Restitution with Interest on Reversed Judgment(Apr 2001) Credit Agricole Indosuez v Banque Nationale de Paris: Letter of Credit Construction & UCP Rules(Feb 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rowena Chew Kiat's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rowena Chew Kiat's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	1,378,360.02	1,378,360.021 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Credit Agricole Indosuez v Banque Nationale de Paris: Restitution with Interest on Reversed Judgment 05 Apr 2001 Banque Nationale de Paris (Respondent)Lost	05 Apr 2001	Banque Nationale de Paris (Respondent): Orders to refund judgment sum with interestOrdered to refund US$1,378,360.02 plus interest at 6% per annum from the date of receipt of the judgment sum to the date of the Court of Appeal's judgment.
2	Credit Agricole Indosuez v Banque Nationale de Paris: Letter of Credit Construction & UCP Rules 13 Feb 2001 Banque Nationale de Paris (Respondent)Lost	13 Feb 2001	Banque Nationale de Paris (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against Banque Nationale de Paris was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).