Roy Paul Mukkam

Roy Paul Mukkam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in employment law and work injury compensation. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated expertise across 51 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Frustration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Authority of Agent	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Leave to Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Frustration of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
COVID-19 Measures	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority shareholders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel in defiance of statute	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnerships	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legitimate expectations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Separate legal personality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Benefit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Memorandum and articles of association	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and bonds	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Separability Doctrine	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Oppressive Conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unfairly Prejudicial Conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roy Paul Mukkam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Roy Paul Mukkam has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
DL Law Corporation	2 cases	40% of cases	Lachman's Emporium Pte Ltd v Kang Tien Kuan: Application for Leave to Appeal on Frustration of Tenancy Agreement due to COVID-19 Measures(Mar 2022) Lachman’s Emporium v Kang Tien Kuan: Frustration of Tenancy Agreement Due to COVID-19 Restrictions(Jan 2022)
AW Law LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Mface Pte Ltd v. Chin Oi Ching: Unenforceability of Loan Agreement due to Unlicensed Moneylending(Sep 2024)
Yeo Perumal Mohideen Law Corporation	1 cases	20% of cases	Agilah v Commissioner for Labour: Judicial Review of Work Injury Compensation Assessment(Mar 2019)
Stamford Law Corporation	1 cases	20% of cases	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order for Breach of Fiduciary Duty(Aug 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Roy Paul Mukkam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.9
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%
Won	28.8 parties avg	8.8	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Roy Paul Mukkam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	84,000.00	42,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mface Pte Ltd v. Chin Oi Ching: Unenforceability of Loan Agreement due to Unlicensed Moneylending 15 Sep 2024 Chin Oi Ching (Defendant)Won	15 Sep 2024	Chin Oi Ching (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment in favour of Chin; Mface to pay costs fixed at $80,000 and specified disbursements to Chin. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lachman's Emporium Pte Ltd v Kang Tien Kuan: Application for Leave to Appeal on Frustration of Tenancy Agreement due to COVID-19 Measures 23 Mar 2022 Lachman’s Emporium Pte Ltd (Applicant, Plaintiff)Lost	23 Mar 2022	Lachman’s Emporium Pte Ltd (Applicant, Plaintiff): Leave application dismissedLachman's Emporium Pte Ltd's application for leave to appeal was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay costs of $4,000 to Kang Tien Kuan (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Lachman’s Emporium v Kang Tien Kuan: Frustration of Tenancy Agreement Due to COVID-19 Restrictions 25 Jan 2022 Lachman’s Emporium Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Jan 2022	Lachman’s Emporium Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application for Summary Judgment DismissedThe plaintiff's application for summary judgment was dismissed, with costs to be in the cause.
4	Agilah v Commissioner for Labour: Judicial Review of Work Injury Compensation Assessment 21 Mar 2019 Agilah a/p Ramasamy (Applicant)Lost	21 Mar 2019	Agilah a/p Ramasamy (Applicant): Application for leave to commence judicial review dismissedApplication for leave to commence judicial review dismissed on the basis that alternative remedies have not been exhausted.
5	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 05 Aug 2015 Teo Tian Seng (Plaintiff)Won	05 Aug 2015	Teo Tian Seng (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedConsent Order set aside.