Roy Yeo

Roy Yeo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and negligence. Their track record shows a 22.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Roy Yeo has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in evidence and automobile accidents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Evidence	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Similar fact evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of oral agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claims	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roy Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Roy Yeo has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chia Yeo Partnership	4 cases	50% of cases	Cheong Gim Fah v Murugian: Dependency Claim Assessment After Fatal Accident(May 2004) Cheong Ghim Fah v Murugian: Negligence, Contributory Negligence & Highway Code Breach in Pedestrian Road Accident(Feb 2004) Re Yeh Ee Swan: Application for Authority to Manage Bank Accounts under Mental Disorders and Treatment Act(Oct 2003)
Sterling Law Corporation	3 cases	38% of cases	Shenzhen Kenouxin v Heliyanto: Agency, Contract Breach & Agent's Liabilities(Jul 2016) Kong Chee Chui v Soh Ghee Hong: Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Breach of Trust, and Unjust Enrichment Claim(Jan 2014) Tan Choon Yong v Goh Jon Keat: Shareholder Oppression under Companies Act(Apr 2009)
Chia Yeo Partnerhip	1 cases	13% of cases	Cheong Ghim Fah v Murugian: Taxation of Costs on High Court Scale for Subordinate Court Jurisdiction(Jun 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Roy Yeo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 3 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Lost	34.3 parties avg	4.3	38%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Won	22.7 parties avg	2.7	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2004	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Roy Yeo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(11%)	11%
Lost	3(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(11%)	11%
Partial	2(22%)	22%
Won	2(22%)	22%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	71,000.00	23,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	4 121	Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Shenzhen Kenouxin v Heliyanto: Agency, Contract Breach & Agent's Liabilities 20 Jul 2016 Shenzhen Kenouxin Electronic Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Jul 2016	Shenzhen Kenouxin Electronic Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against the first defendant is dismissed with costs to be taxed in a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Kong Chee Chui v Soh Ghee Hong: Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Breach of Trust, and Unjust Enrichment Claim 12 Jan 2014 Soh Ghee Hong (Defendant)Won	12 Jan 2014	Soh Ghee Hong (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant on claims of fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of trust, and unjust enrichment, except for the sixth plaintiff's claim for loan repayment.
3	Tan Choon Yong v Goh Jon Keat: Shareholder Oppression under Companies Act 29 Apr 2009 Alphomega Research Group Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Apr 2009	Alphomega Research Group Ltd (Defendant): Order to purchase shares or company wound upThe court ordered Mr. Goh and Ms. Tan to purchase the shares of Dr. Tan at an agreed price or at a price determined by a jointly appointed valuer, whose decision, which is not to take into account any discount for minority shareholdings, shall be final. If there is no agreement between the parties on the price or on the mechanism and other relevant details for determining the price of the shares within 30 days, the company will be wound up.
4	Cheong Ghim Fah v Murugian: Taxation of Costs on High Court Scale for Subordinate Court Jurisdiction 10 Jun 2004 Goh Jak Fong @ Goh Jit Fong (Plaintiff)Won	10 Jun 2004	Goh Jak Fong @ Goh Jit Fong (Plaintiff): Costs to be taxed on the High Court scalePlaintiffs were entitled to have commenced the subject proceedings in the High Court and directed that the plaintiffs’ costs be assessed on the High Court scale. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Cheong Gim Fah v Murugian: Dependency Claim Assessment After Fatal Accident 04 May 2004 Goh Jak Fong alias Goh Jit Fong (Plaintiff)Neutral	04 May 2004	Goh Jak Fong alias Goh Jit Fong (Plaintiff): NeutralGoh Jak Fong is listed as a plaintiff, but the judgment does not specify an individual outcome for this party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Cheong Ghim Fah v Murugian: Negligence, Contributory Negligence & Highway Code Breach in Pedestrian Road Accident 06 Feb 2004 Goh Jak Fong @ Goh Jit Fong (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Feb 2004	Goh Jak Fong @ Goh Jit Fong (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff, with liability apportioned 85% to the defendant and 15% to the deceased. Damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Re Yeh Ee Swan: Application for Authority to Manage Bank Accounts under Mental Disorders and Treatment Act 22 Oct 2003 Tan Poh Sua (Applicant)Dismissed	22 Oct 2003	Tan Poh Sua (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for an order authorizing Tan Poh Sua to manage and operate three POSB bank accounts that are in the name of his wife Yeh Ee Swan, and also to open a new account in the name of ‘Committee of the Person and Estate of Yeh Ee Swan’ was dismissed.
8	Tan Mui Teck v Public Prosecutor: False Evidence, Conflicting Expert Testimony & Sentencing 24 Jul 2003 Tan Mui Teck (Appellant)Lost	24 Jul 2003	Tan Mui Teck (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissedThe appellant's appeal against conviction was dismissed.