Roy Yeo Kan Kiang

Roy Yeo Kan Kiang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in building and construction contracts and construction law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and building and construction contracts.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Transfer	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction of statute	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Incorporation of main contract terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages for defects	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty as to materials and workmanship	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to design	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defect Claims	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Variation of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ground for termination of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defective Works	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rectification Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Property	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contractual Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Roy Yeo Kan Kiang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Sterling Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	Pang Swee Kang v Low Chui Ying Foreen: Share Transfer Dispute in Animal Practice Pte Ltd(Jan 2012) Chye Heng Huat Engineering v Concept Builders: Construction Dispute over Defective Steel Fittings(May 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Roy Yeo Kan Kiang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Roy Yeo Kan Kiang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	304,458.06	304,458.061 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Pang Swee Kang v Low Chui Ying Foreen: Share Transfer Dispute in Animal Practice Pte Ltd 16 Jan 2012 Pang Swee Kang (Plaintiff)Dismissed	16 Jan 2012	Pang Swee Kang (Plaintiff): Action dismissedThe court refused to grant the declarations sought by the Husband and dismissed his action.
2	Chye Heng Huat Engineering v Concept Builders: Construction Dispute over Defective Steel Fittings 26 May 2010 Chye Heng Huat Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	26 May 2010	Chye Heng Huat Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partJudgment granted to the plaintiff for $304,458.06 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).