Ruby Tan

Ruby Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and legal ethics and professional responsibility. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ruby Tan has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Ruby Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ruby Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ruby Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ruby Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ruby Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ruby Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ruby Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ruby Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ruby Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ruby Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Officer of the Court	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ruby Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ruby Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Abu Bakar Tan Ibrahim and Partners	2 cases	100% of cases	Public Trustee v By Products Traders: Solicitor's Duty to Court and Payment Out of Court(May 2005) By Products Traders v JAK Alhadad: Refund of Deposits & Misrepresentation in Property Sale(Nov 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ruby Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.5 parties avg	5.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ruby Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,270,000.00	4,270,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Trustee v By Products Traders: Solicitor's Duty to Court and Payment Out of Court 25 May 2005 JAK Alhadad & Co Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 May 2005	JAK Alhadad & Co Pte Ltd (Defendant): Order to return moneysJAK ordered to return moneys improperly paid to its solicitors. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	By Products Traders v JAK Alhadad: Refund of Deposits & Misrepresentation in Property Sale 25 Nov 2004 JAK Alhadad & Co Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 Nov 2004	JAK Alhadad & Co Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim dismissed.