Rudy Gunaratnam

Rudy Gunaratnam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rudy Gunaratnam has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in offences and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Offences	3 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rudy Gunaratnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rudy Gunaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rudy Gunaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rudy Gunaratnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rudy Gunaratnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rudy Gunaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rudy Gunaratnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rudy Gunaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Common object	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Rudy Gunaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trafficking in controlled drugs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rudy Gunaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rudy Gunaratnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rudy Gunaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rudy Gunaratnam has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah and Cheah	2 cases	67% of cases	Mohd Arsad bin Hassan v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking in Diamorphine - Defence of Lack of Knowledge(Aug 2004) PP v Mohd Arsad: Trafficking Diamorphine Exceeding 15g - Mandatory Death Penalty(Mar 2004)
Rudy & Partners	1 cases	33% of cases	Mohamed Abdullah v PP: Unlawful Assembly, Rioting, Deadly Weapons(May 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rudy Gunaratnam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rudy Gunaratnam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohd Arsad bin Hassan v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking in Diamorphine - Defence of Lack of Knowledge 22 Aug 2004 Mohd Arsad bin Hassan (Appellant)Lost	22 Aug 2004	Mohd Arsad bin Hassan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction for trafficking in diamorphine was dismissed.
2	PP v Mohd Arsad: Trafficking Diamorphine Exceeding 15g - Mandatory Death Penalty 31 Mar 2004 Mohd Arsad bin Hassan (Defendant)Lost	31 Mar 2004	Mohd Arsad bin Hassan (Defendant): Accused found guiltyThe accused was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to death.
3	Mohamed Abdullah v PP: Unlawful Assembly, Rioting, Deadly Weapons 02 May 2000 Mohamed Abdullah s/o Abdul Razak (Appellant)Lost	02 May 2000	Mohamed Abdullah s/o Abdul Razak (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.