S Karthikeyan

S Karthikeyan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and torts.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

S Karthikeyan has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	S Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	S Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Karthikeyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Karthikeyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

S Karthikeyan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Toh Tan LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Wang Sam Lin v Burridge Steven Harold: Trespass, Negligence, and Breach of Contract in Horse Training Dispute(Nov 2009)
Karthikeyan and Co	1 cases	33% of cases	Diva XL Pte Ltd v Goenka Mahesh Kumar: Tort of Conversion and Inducement of Breach of Contract(Jun 2004)
Karthikeyan & Co	1 cases	33% of cases	Diva XL v Lalasis: Refund of Deposit for Non-Delivery of Computer Products(Apr 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of S Karthikeyan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of S Karthikeyan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Other	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Other: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wang Sam Lin v Burridge Steven Harold: Trespass, Negligence, and Breach of Contract in Horse Training Dispute 05 Nov 2009 Burridge Steven Harold (trading as Steven Burridge Racing Stables) (Defendant)Other	05 Nov 2009	Burridge Steven Harold (trading as Steven Burridge Racing Stables) (Defendant): Costs AwardedDefendant to be paid costs of defending the action and the costs of the counterclaim. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Diva XL Pte Ltd v Goenka Mahesh Kumar: Tort of Conversion and Inducement of Breach of Contract 29 Jun 2004 Goenka Mahesh Kumar (Defendant)Lost	29 Jun 2004	Goenka Mahesh Kumar (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's defense was rejected, and the claim against him was successful. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Diva XL v Lalasis: Refund of Deposit for Non-Delivery of Computer Products 24 Apr 2003 Lalasis Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	24 Apr 2003	Lalasis Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant’s counterclaim is dismissed.