S Kumar

S Kumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in drink driving and road traffic act.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

S Kumar has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in sentencing and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Sentencing	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Misleading Statements	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

S Kumar has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
SK Kumar & Associates	2 cases	100% of cases	Phua Mong Seng v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Inducement to Invest & False Statements under Companies Act(Nov 2001) Madiaalakan v PP: Failure to Provide Breath Sample & Enhanced Penalties Under Road Traffic Act(Oct 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of S Kumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of S Kumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Phua Mong Seng v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Inducement to Invest & False Statements under Companies Act 11 Nov 2001 Phua Mong Seng (Appellant)Lost	11 Nov 2001	Phua Mong Seng (Appellant): Appeal Dismissed; Sentence EnhancedAppeal against sentence dismissed, and the sentence was enhanced from one month to two months' imprisonment on the first charge and from four months to six months' imprisonment on the second charge, both to run concurrently.
2	Madiaalakan v PP: Failure to Provide Breath Sample & Enhanced Penalties Under Road Traffic Act 30 Oct 2001 Madiaalakan s/o Muthusamy (Appellant)Lost	30 Oct 2001	Madiaalakan s/o Muthusamy (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction was dismissed.