S Radakrishnan

S Radakrishnan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and outrage of modesty.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

S Radakrishnan has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	S Radakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	S Radakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Radakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S Radakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Visitation Rights	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S Radakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	S Radakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S Radakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Radakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Radakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Radakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Radakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Forensic Science	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Radakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Radakrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S Radakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

S Radakrishnan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	33% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Tharema Vejayan: Murder, Intoxication, Diminished Responsibility, Provocation(Jun 2009)
Bernard Rada and Lee Law Corporation	1 cases	33% of cases	CX v CY: Child Custody and Access Dispute Between Parents in Different Jurisdictions(Jul 2005)
Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee	1 cases	33% of cases	Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor: Outrage of Modesty Appeal(Sep 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of S Radakrishnan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of S Radakrishnan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Tharema Vejayan: Murder, Intoxication, Diminished Responsibility, Provocation 18 Jun 2009 Tharema Vejayan s/o Govindasamy (Defense)Lost	18 Jun 2009	Tharema Vejayan s/o Govindasamy (Defense): ConvictedAccused convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
2	CX v CY: Child Custody and Access Dispute Between Parents in Different Jurisdictions 18 Jul 2005 CX (Appellant)Lost	18 Jul 2005	CX (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against joint custody and overseas access orders dismissed. No orders on costs were made. Security deposit to be returned to the mother. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor: Outrage of Modesty Appeal 29 Sep 2003 Goh Han Heng (Appellant)Lost	29 Sep 2003	Goh Han Heng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction was dismissed.