S S Dhillon

S S Dhillon is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 23.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 23% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

S S Dhillon has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	13 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	12 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
House-breaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unnatural Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Housebreaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gang Crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S S Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

S S Dhillon has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dhillon Dendroff & Partners	7 cases	54% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Ridwan: Sentencing for Grievous Hurt with Dangerous Weapons under Penal Code(Mar 2003) PP v Ng Beng Siang: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act(Jan 2003) PP v Mohamed Abdul Nasser & Ashok Kumar Giri: Trafficking of Cannabis(Apr 2001)
Dhillon & Panoo LLC	2 cases	15% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and House-breaking Sentencing(Mar 2023) Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and Housebreaking by Night(Jan 2023)
Dhillon & Partners	2 cases	15% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Abdul Salam bin Musthafa: Drug Trafficking Conspiracy Case(Mar 2010) Public Prosecutor v Norezam bin Mohsin: Sentencing Parity in Culpable Homicide Case(Oct 2007)
Dhillon Dendroff and Partners	2 cases	15% of cases	Annis bin Abdullah v PP: Unnatural Offences, Fellatio & Sentencing Principles(Mar 2004) PP v Teo Yeow Chuah: Trafficking Diamorphine, Admissibility of Statements, Capital Punishment Awareness(Dec 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of S S Dhillon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 3 (23%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	103.2 parties avg	3.2	77%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	23%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2001	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2003	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of S S Dhillon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(77%)	77%
Won	3(23%)	23%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and House-breaking Sentencing 30 Mar 2023 Yap Pow Foo (Defendant)Lost	30 Mar 2023	Yap Pow Foo (Defendant): Accused SentencedAccused sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane.
2	Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and Housebreaking by Night 15 Jan 2023 Yap Pow Foo (Defendant)Lost	15 Jan 2023	Yap Pow Foo (Defendant): LostAccused found guilty on both charges.
3	Public Prosecutor v Abdul Salam bin Musthafa: Drug Trafficking Conspiracy Case 14 Mar 2010 Abdul Salam bin Musthafa (Defendant)Lost	14 Mar 2010	Abdul Salam bin Musthafa (Defendant): Convicted on all chargesAccused was found guilty on all five charges of drug trafficking and sentenced to 30 years imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
4	Public Prosecutor v Norezam bin Mohsin: Sentencing Parity in Culpable Homicide Case 16 Oct 2007 Khairul Iskandar Bin Khamsani (Defendant)Lost	16 Oct 2007	Khairul Iskandar Bin Khamsani (Defendant): Imprisonment and CaningSentenced to ten years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane.
5	Annis bin Abdullah v PP: Unnatural Offences, Fellatio & Sentencing Principles 04 Mar 2004 Annis bin Abdullah (Appellant)Won	04 Mar 2004	Annis bin Abdullah (Appellant): Appeal against sentence allowedAppeal against sentence allowed; sentence reduced to 12 months imprisonment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	PP v Teo Yeow Chuah: Trafficking Diamorphine, Admissibility of Statements, Capital Punishment Awareness 05 Dec 2003 Teo Yeow Chuah (Defendant)Lost	05 Dec 2003	Teo Yeow Chuah (Defendant): ConvictionAccused convicted on the charge and sentenced according to the law.
7	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Ridwan: Sentencing for Grievous Hurt with Dangerous Weapons under Penal Code 04 Mar 2003 Samsul Ariffin Bin Samsudi (Defendant)Lost	04 Mar 2003	Samsul Ariffin Bin Samsudi (Defendant): Sentence of imprisonment and caningSentenced to eight years’ imprisonment and eight strokes of the cane.
8	PP v Ng Beng Siang: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act 23 Jan 2003 Rosdi Bin Pungot (Defendant)Lost	23 Jan 2003	Rosdi Bin Pungot (Defendant): Guilty verdict; mandatory death sentence imposedThe court found the second accused guilty and imposed the mandatory death sentence.
9	PP v Mohamed Abdul Nasser & Ashok Kumar Giri: Trafficking of Cannabis 25 Apr 2001 Mohamed Abdul Nasser bin Mahamood (Defendant)Won	25 Apr 2001	Mohamed Abdul Nasser bin Mahamood (Defendant): Discharged and AcquittedThe first accused was discharged and acquitted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Public Prosecutor v Solaiyan Arumugam: Rape and Molest Case 25 Apr 2001 Solaiyan Arumugam (Defense)Lost	25 Apr 2001	Solaiyan Arumugam (Defense): Accused found guiltyAccused was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane in respect the first charge and two years imprisonment and two strokes of the cane in respect of the third charge. The sentence of imprisonment in respect of the second charge should be served concurrently with that of the first.
11	Public Prosecutor v Zulfikar bin Mustaffah: Trafficking of Diamorphine 05 Nov 2000 Zulfikar bin Mustaffah (Defendant)Lost	05 Nov 2000	Zulfikar bin Mustaffah (Defendant): ConvictedAccused convicted as charged.
12	Public Prosecutor v Lim Beng Soon: Trafficking in Controlled Drugs 09 May 2000 Henry Tan Kok Hwa (Defendant)Won	09 May 2000	Henry Tan Kok Hwa (Defendant): AcquittedDischarged and acquitted of the charge of conspiracy to traffic in a controlled drug.
13	PP v Sharom bin Ahmad: Trafficking Diamorphine & Criminal Conspiracy 13 Apr 2000 Sharom bin Ahmad (Defendant)Lost	13 Apr 2000	Sharom bin Ahmad (Defendant): Guilty verdictSharom bin Ahmad was found guilty on the amended charge.