S Selvam Satanam

S Selvam Satanam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and contractual terms.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in remedies and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Remedies	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Insurance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Warranty of Authority	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual Indemnity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Subrogation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Selvam Satanam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

S Selvam Satanam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ramdas & Wong	2 cases	100% of cases	HSBC vs DNKH: Indemnity Clause Interpretation in Warehouse Fire Loss(Apr 2023) HSBC v DNKH Logistics: Indemnity Clause Interpretation in Lease Agreement(Oct 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of S Selvam Satanam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of S Selvam Satanam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(50%)	50%
Lost	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	30,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	HSBC vs DNKH: Indemnity Clause Interpretation in Warehouse Fire Loss 13 Apr 2023 HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Ltd (as trustee of AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT) (Appellant)Lost	13 Apr 2023	HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Ltd (as trustee of AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	HSBC v DNKH Logistics: Indemnity Clause Interpretation in Lease Agreement 02 Oct 2022 HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Ltd (as trustee of AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT) (Plaintiff)Dismissed	02 Oct 2022	HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Ltd (as trustee of AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for indemnity was dismissed.