S Suressh

S Suressh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of confidence and inducement of breach of contract. Their track record shows a 31.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 46% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

S Suressh has demonstrated expertise across 72 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	10 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpleader	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directorial Misfeasance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Substratum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Data Protection	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Computer Misuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Secured Convertible Note	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debenture	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Notes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sovereign Immunity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Invoice Discounting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Payment Undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consumer Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Secrets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S Suressh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

S Suressh has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	6 cases	46% of cases	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes(Aug 2010) Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Breach of Contract over Refusal to Issue Corporate Notes(Apr 2010) WestLB AG v Philippine National Bank: Sovereign Immunity & Commercial Transactions(Dec 2006)
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	5 cases	38% of cases	ANB v ANC: Breach of Confidence & Surreptitious Data Copying in Divorce Proceedings(Aug 2015) ANB v ANC: Illegally Obtained Evidence & Exclusionary Discretion in Civil Proceedings(Sep 2014) Zoom Communications v Broadcast Solutions: Forum Non Conveniens & Submission to Jurisdiction(Aug 2014)
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP	2 cases	15% of cases	Foo v ERC Prime II: Winding Up, Directorial Misfeasance & Loss of Confidence(Oct 2018) Law Society of Singapore v Ismail bin Atan: Disciplinary Proceedings for Solicitor's Misconduct(Jul 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of S Suressh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 6 (46%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	8%
Lost	45.6 parties avg	5.6	31%
Neutral	35.0 parties avg	5.0	23%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Won	43.0 parties avg	3.0	31%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2006	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2010	34.8 parties avg	4.8
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of S Suressh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(8%)	8%
Lost	4(31%)	31%
Neutral	3(23%)	23%
Partial	1(8%)	8%
Won	4(31%)	31%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	2,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 21	Neutral: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Foo v ERC Prime II: Winding Up, Directorial Misfeasance & Loss of Confidence 21 Oct 2018 Koh Poh Leng (Gao Baoling) (Respondent)Lost	21 Oct 2018	Koh Poh Leng (Gao Baoling) (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; winding up of GREIC ordered.
2	Law Society of Singapore v Ismail bin Atan: Disciplinary Proceedings for Solicitor's Misconduct 25 Jul 2017 The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	25 Jul 2017	The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantThe applicant is to have its costs fixed in the sum of $8,000 together with reasonable disbursements to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	ANB v ANC: Breach of Confidence & Surreptitious Data Copying in Divorce Proceedings 20 Aug 2015 AND (Respondent)Lost	20 Aug 2015	AND (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and the interlocutory injunction was granted.
4	ANB v ANC: Illegally Obtained Evidence & Exclusionary Discretion in Civil Proceedings 09 Sep 2014 AND (Defendant)Partial	09 Sep 2014	AND (Defendant): Application allowed in partThe defendant's application to set aside the interim injunction was allowed in part.
5	Zoom Communications v Broadcast Solutions: Forum Non Conveniens & Submission to Jurisdiction 19 Aug 2014 Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd (Respondent)Neutral	19 Aug 2014	Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; each party to bear its own costs.
6	Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Hashu Dhalomal Shahdadpuri: Conspiracy & MTIC Fraud 28 Jun 2011 Hashu Dhalomal Shahdadpuri (Respondent)Lost	28 Jun 2011	Hashu Dhalomal Shahdadpuri (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the respondent was allowed.
7	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes 25 Aug 2010 Schroder Venture Managers Inc (Other)Neutral	25 Aug 2010	Schroder Venture Managers Inc (Other): NeutralThird party to the suit.
8	Rikvin Consultancy v Boparai: Interim Injunction for Defamation & Contract Breach 04 Jul 2010 Janus Corporate Solutions (Defendant)Won	04 Jul 2010	Janus Corporate Solutions (Defendant): Application allowedThe defendant's application to set aside the injunction order was allowed.
9	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Breach of Contract over Refusal to Issue Corporate Notes 25 Apr 2010 Anchor Victory Ltd (Third Party)Neutral	25 Apr 2010	Anchor Victory Ltd (Third Party): NeutralThe court held that the Outline was not binding on the third parties and the third parties were not parties to the Capital Raising Agreement. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	WestLB AG v Philippine National Bank: Sovereign Immunity & Commercial Transactions 26 Dec 2006 Republic of the Philippines (Defendant)Lost	26 Dec 2006	Republic of the Philippines (Defendant): LostThe Republic's application to stay the claims of the 1st, 2nd to 6th, and 7th Defendants to the subject matter of these proceedings was dismissed.
11	Stratech Systems Ltd v Nyam Chiu Shin: Breach of Contract & Confidentiality 27 Mar 2005 Wong Leh Hung (Respondent)Won	27 Mar 2005	Wong Leh Hung (Respondent): Claim DismissedThe claim against Wong Leh Hung was dismissed.
12	Stratech Systems Ltd v Nyam Chiu Shin: Trade Secrets, Confidential Information, Inducement of Breach of Contract 10 Aug 2004 Wong Leh Hung (Defendant)Dismissed	10 Aug 2004	Wong Leh Hung (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against the second defendant was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Societe Generale v Statoil Asia Pacific: Payment Confirmation & Invoice Discounting Dispute 19 Apr 2000 Statoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	19 Apr 2000	Statoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs.