Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem

Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and strata title law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Ratification	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Assignment	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Maintenance and champerty	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Building Management and Strata Management Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
M & A Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	Asidokona Mining Resources v Alternative Advisors: Ratification & Loan Agreement Dispute(Feb 2023) Prem N Shamdasani v Management Corporation: Strata Title Dispute over Balcony Renovations(Nov 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Asidokona Mining Resources v Alternative Advisors: Ratification & Loan Agreement Dispute 02 Feb 2023 Soh Sai Kiang (Appellant, Defendant)Won	02 Feb 2023	Soh Sai Kiang (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the appellants are not required to pay the principal sum of the loan and interest.
2	Prem N Shamdasani v Management Corporation: Strata Title Dispute over Balcony Renovations 03 Nov 2022 Prem N Shamdasani (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	03 Nov 2022	Prem N Shamdasani (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, except in relation to the question of damages.