Sambasivam s/o Kunju

Sambasivam s/o Kunju is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judicial interference. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sambasivam s/o Kunju has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sambasivam s/o Kunju has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Sambasivam s/o Kunju has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sambasivam s/o Kunju has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Sambasivam s/o Kunju has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sambasivam s/o Kunju has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Judicial Interference	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sambasivam s/o Kunju has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sambasivam s/o Kunju has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Consent Order	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sambasivam s/o Kunju has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sambasivam s/o Kunju has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sambasivam s/o Kunju has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sambasivam s/o Kunju has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sambasivam s/o Kunju has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Independent Practitioner	2 cases	100% of cases	Nim Minimaart v Management Corporation: Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction(Oct 2013) Nim Minimaart v Management Corp: Setting Aside Consent Order Due to Judicial Pressure(Nov 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sambasivam s/o Kunju's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	110.0 parties avg	10.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sambasivam s/o Kunju's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nim Minimaart v Management Corporation: Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction 10 Oct 2013 Nim Minimaart (suing as a firm) (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Oct 2013	Nim Minimaart (suing as a firm) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiff's claim was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Nim Minimaart v Management Corp: Setting Aside Consent Order Due to Judicial Pressure 05 Nov 2009 Nim Minimaart (a firm) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	05 Nov 2009	Nim Minimaart (a firm) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Consent Order set aside; new trial ordered. No costs awarded. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).