Samuel Yap Zong En

Samuel Yap Zong En is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and sentencing. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Prisoners Rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Capital Punishment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Appeals	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Appeals	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Samuel Yap Zong En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Samuel Yap Zong En has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	4 cases	100% of cases	Roslan bin Bakar v Public Prosecutor: Costs for Frivolous Criminal Motion and Judicial Review Appeal(Jul 2022) Roslan bin Bakar v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Death Sentences Based on Mental Disability(Mar 2022) Roslan bin Bakar v Public Prosecutor: Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction and Death Sentence(Mar 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Samuel Yap Zong En's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	44.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	34.3 parties avg	4.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Samuel Yap Zong En's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9,000.00	9,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Roslan bin Bakar v Public Prosecutor: Costs for Frivolous Criminal Motion and Judicial Review Appeal 26 Jul 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent, Defendant)Won	26 Jul 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent, Defendant): Costs awardedCosts of $4,000 awarded against Mr. Yeo. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Roslan bin Bakar v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Death Sentences Based on Mental Disability 08 Mar 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	08 Mar 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of the Attorney-General.
3	Roslan bin Bakar v Public Prosecutor: Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction and Death Sentence 06 Mar 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Mar 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): WonApplication for review was dismissed.
4	PP v Khor Chong Seng & Han Fang Guang: Misuse of Drugs Act Importation & Trafficking 04 Oct 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Oct 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of both accusedThe Public Prosecutor secured the conviction of both accused on charges under the Misuse of Drugs Act.