Sandra Tan Pei May

Sandra Tan Pei May is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in strata title law and misrepresentation. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and real estate.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
SIA Conditions of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Leasing Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sandra Tan Pei May has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sandra Tan Pei May has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	SKK (S) Pte Ltd v Management Corporation: Repainting Contract Dispute over Paint Specifications and Payment(Sep 2011) Ground & Sharp v Midview: Enforceability of Option to Purchase in 'Subject to Contract' Letters of Intent(Sep 2008) Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages(Apr 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sandra Tan Pei May's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sandra Tan Pei May's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,000.00	1,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	SKK (S) Pte Ltd v Management Corporation: Repainting Contract Dispute over Paint Specifications and Payment 25 Sep 2011 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1166 (Defendant)Lost	25 Sep 2011	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1166 (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ground & Sharp v Midview: Enforceability of Option to Purchase in 'Subject to Contract' Letters of Intent 21 Sep 2008 Midview Realty Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	21 Sep 2008	Midview Realty Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; costs awarded in the amount of $4,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages 08 Apr 2008 Wishing Star Ltd (Appellant)Partial	08 Apr 2008	Wishing Star Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part with regard to the award which the Judge made for damages claimed under item (a).
4	Dynamic Investments v Lee Chee Kian: Collective Sale Dispute over Strata Title Distribution 12 Dec 2007 Dynamic Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	12 Dec 2007	Dynamic Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.