Sangeeta Subrahmanyam

Sangeeta Subrahmanyam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and mareva injunctions. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and enforcement of foreign judgments.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Order	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sangeeta Subrahmanyam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah and Tann	1 cases	100% of cases	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order(Apr 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sangeeta Subrahmanyam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sangeeta Subrahmanyam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order 25 Apr 2005 Karma International SARL (Plaintiff)Partial	25 Apr 2005	Karma International SARL (Plaintiff): Application allowed in partApplication for fortification of undertakings as to damages allowed in part for the third defendant only.