Sanjiv Rajan

Sanjiv Rajan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and admission to the bar. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admission to the Bar	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Voyeuristic Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Attempted Rape	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Penetration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Association Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Salesmen’s puff	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sanjiv Rajan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sanjiv Rajan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	6 cases	67% of cases	Re Mohamad Shafee Khamis: Admission to the Bar, Sexual Offences, Public Trust(Oct 2024) Attorney-General v. Shahira Banu: Legal Profession - Duty of Candour in Admission to the Bar(May 2024) CIE v CIF: Setting Aside Portions of Arbitration Award for Breach of Contract(Jan 2021)
Allen & Gledhill	3 cases	33% of cases	Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in Club Membership(Nov 2002) Public Prosecutor v Syed Abdul Mutalip & Roetikno: Drug Trafficking Case(Feb 2002) Lau Ah Lang v Chan Huang Seng: Validity of Zu-Lin Temple Association EOGM & Management Committee Election(Jul 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sanjiv Rajan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 3 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	11%
Won	44.3 parties avg	4.3	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	27.0 parties avg	7.0
2016	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sanjiv Rajan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(11%)	11%
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Won	4(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Mohamad Shafee Khamis: Admission to the Bar, Sexual Offences, Public Trust 27 Oct 2024 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Partial	27 Oct 2024	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Objection partially successfulThe Law Society objected to the admission, and the court imposed a Minimum Exclusionary Period, aligning with their suggested range.
2	Attorney-General v. Shahira Banu: Legal Profession - Duty of Candour in Admission to the Bar 01 May 2024 Law Society of Singapore (Other)Neutral	01 May 2024	Law Society of Singapore (Other): NeutralThe Law Society of Singapore was invited to address the court on the issue of the duty of candour owed by an A&S and by applicants for admission.
3	CIE v CIF: Setting Aside Portions of Arbitration Award for Breach of Contract 25 Jan 2021 CIF (Defendant)Won	25 Jan 2021	CIF (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe Claimant's application to set aside portions of the arbitration award was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Asep Ardiansyah v Public Prosecutor: Attempted Rape & Sexual Penetration of Intoxicated Complainant 23 Jul 2020 Asep Ardiansyah (Appellant)Lost	23 Jul 2020	Asep Ardiansyah (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction for sexual assault by penetration and attempted rape was dismissed.
5	Jeganathan Ramasamy v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Criminal Breach of Trust 19 Oct 2016 Jeganathan Ramasamy (Appellant)Won	19 Oct 2016	Jeganathan Ramasamy (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal against conviction allowed, and the appellant is acquitted and discharged.
6	PP v Selamat Bin Paki: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Oct 2016 Selamat bin Paki (Defendant)Lost	19 Oct 2016	Selamat bin Paki (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of trafficking in a controlled drug, namely, diamorphine.
7	Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in Club Membership 21 Nov 2002 Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	21 Nov 2002	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantClaims for misrepresentation and breach of contract dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Public Prosecutor v Syed Abdul Mutalip & Roetikno: Drug Trafficking Case 17 Feb 2002 Roetikno Bin Shariff (Defendant)Lost	17 Feb 2002	Roetikno Bin Shariff (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe Defendant lost the case and was found guilty as charged.
9	Lau Ah Lang v Chan Huang Seng: Validity of Zu-Lin Temple Association EOGM & Management Committee Election 09 Jul 2001 Lau Ah Lang (Plaintiff)Won	09 Jul 2001	Lau Ah Lang (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; the appointment of the defendants as the seventh management committee was declared null and void.