Sankaran Karthikeyan

Sankaran Karthikeyan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 22.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Products	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loss of Amenities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional architectural services	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tort of Conspiracy to Defraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sankaran Karthikeyan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sankaran Karthikeyan has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Toh Tan LLP	4 cases	50% of cases	Culindo Livestock v Ananda UK: Breach of Contract for Supply of Ceftiofur Sodium(Sep 2014) Chenet Finance Ltd v Lim Poh Yen: Conspiracy, Share Transfer, and Pre-emption Rights(Aug 2012) Yap v Tan: Stay of Proceedings & Anti-Suit Injunction in Partnership Dispute(Jan 2011)
Toh Tan & Partners	2 cases	25% of cases	Wong David H v Timothy Seow Group Architects: Extension of Time to Appeal Liquidator's Debt Rejection(Jul 2007) Yap Jeffery v Ho Mun-Tuke: Removal of Liquidator in Company Winding Up(Jun 2006)
Toh Tan and Partners	1 cases	13% of cases	Yap Jeffery Henry v Seow Timothy: Conspiracy to Defraud & Breach of Companies Act(Jan 2006)
Karthikeyan and Co	1 cases	13% of cases	Zubaida Binte Hussain v Tan Sze Joo: Personal Injury Claim for Road Accident(Sep 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sankaran Karthikeyan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 3 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	25%
Neutral	25.6 parties avg	5.6	25%
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2006	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sankaran Karthikeyan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(11%)	11%
Lost	2(22%)	22%
Neutral	2(22%)	22%
Partial	2(22%)	22%
Won	2(22%)	22%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	20,313.24	5,078.314 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Culindo Livestock v Ananda UK: Breach of Contract for Supply of Ceftiofur Sodium 09 Sep 2014 Ananda UK (China) Limited (Defendant)Dismissed	09 Sep 2014	Ananda UK (China) Limited (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim for non-payment of the contract price in respect of the tenth and the eleventh contracts was rejected and dismissed accordingly. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Chenet Finance Ltd v Lim Poh Yen: Conspiracy, Share Transfer, and Pre-emption Rights 02 Aug 2012 Berlian Ferries Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	02 Aug 2012	Berlian Ferries Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim for unlawful act conspiracy dismissedChenet's claim for unlawful act conspiracy against Allene, Abu Bakar, and Berlian was dismissed.
3	Yap v Tan: Stay of Proceedings & Anti-Suit Injunction in Partnership Dispute 10 Jan 2011 Yap Shirley Kathreyn (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	10 Jan 2011	Yap Shirley Kathreyn (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal against the stay of proceedings was dismissed.
4	Boonchai Sompolpong v Low Tuck Kwong: Architectural Services Dispute 05 Sep 2010 Boonchai Sompolpong (Plaintiff)Won	05 Sep 2010	Boonchai Sompolpong (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the exact amount of damages, including interest, was to be determined by the Registrar. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Wong David H v Timothy Seow Group Architects: Extension of Time to Appeal Liquidator's Debt Rejection 04 Jul 2007 Wong David H (Plaintiff)Lost	04 Jul 2007	Wong David H (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to appeal against the rejection of Proof of Debt was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Yap Jeffery v Ho Mun-Tuke: Removal of Liquidator in Company Winding Up 14 Jun 2006 Azlan Bin Abdul Rahim (Plaintiff, Creditor)Partial	14 Jun 2006	Azlan Bin Abdul Rahim (Plaintiff, Creditor): Costs to be determinedPlaintiffs entitled to costs, but amount to be determined due to inclusion of irrelevant matters in affidavit.
7	Yap Jeffery Henry v Seow Timothy: Conspiracy to Defraud & Breach of Companies Act 17 Jan 2006 Yap Jeffery Henry (Plaintiff)Won	17 Jan 2006	Yap Jeffery Henry (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment against the first, second and third defendants as claimed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Zubaida Binte Hussain v Tan Sze Joo: Personal Injury Claim for Road Accident 14 Sep 2004 Ana Mariani Siswadi (Plaintiff)Neutral	14 Sep 2004	Ana Mariani Siswadi (Plaintiff): OtherNo specific outcome mentioned for this party.