Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran

Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in restructuring and dissolution and recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in restructuring and dissolution and recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Oon & Bazul LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Sapura Fabrication Sdn Bhd v GAS: Cross-Border Insolvency, Arbitration, and Enforcement of Arbitral Agreements(Sep 2024) Ascentra Holdings v SPGK: Recognition of Foreign Solvent Liquidation Proceedings in Cross-Border Insolvency(Jan 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	50%
Partial	24.8 parties avg	4.8	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	25.3 parties avg	5.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Santhiya d/o Kulasakeran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sapura Fabrication Sdn Bhd v GAS: Cross-Border Insolvency, Arbitration, and Enforcement of Arbitral Agreements 17 Sep 2024 Norzaimah binti Maarof (Applicant)Neutral	17 Sep 2024	Norzaimah binti Maarof (Applicant): NeutralNo specific outcome recorded for this party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ascentra Holdings v SPGK: Recognition of Foreign Solvent Liquidation Proceedings in Cross-Border Insolvency 24 Jan 2024 Graham Robinson (Appellant, Applicant)Partial	24 Jan 2024	Graham Robinson (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; the Court of Appeal declined to impose the conditions sought by the respondent in respect of the recognition of Ascentra’s Cayman Liquidation as a foreign main proceeding in Singapore, save for the termination of the Automatic Moratorium.