Sarah Ong

Sarah Ong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and penal code. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sarah Ong has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	8 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	7 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Kadar Disclosure Obligations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sarah Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sarah Ong has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	7 cases	88% of cases	Mohammad Azli v PP: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Abetment(Apr 2020) Muhammad Nabill v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Prosecution's Duty to Disclose Material Witness Statements(Mar 2020) Adili Chibuike Ejike v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Substantive Assistance Certificate(Apr 2018)
Attorney-General’s Chamber	1 cases	13% of cases	Cai Mei Ying v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Negligent Cycling Resulting in Grievous Hurt(Feb 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sarah Ong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 1 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	13%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Won	62.0 parties avg	2.0	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sarah Ong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(13%)	13%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	6(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,000.00	500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohammad Azli v PP: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Abetment 22 Apr 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	22 Apr 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was partially dismissed as Azli's appeal was allowed.
2	Muhammad Nabill v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Prosecution's Duty to Disclose Material Witness Statements 30 Mar 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	30 Mar 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially lostAppeal allowed in part. Conviction for trafficking in diamorphine set aside, substituted with conviction for possession. Conviction for trafficking in cannabis set aside.
3	Cai Mei Ying v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Negligent Cycling Resulting in Grievous Hurt 06 Feb 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Feb 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Sentence UpheldThe original sentence of two weeks' imprisonment was upheld.
4	Adili Chibuike Ejike v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Substantive Assistance Certificate 26 Apr 2018 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	26 Apr 2018	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Applicant's application for leave to commence judicial review proceedings was dismissed. Both parties bear their own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Public Prosecutor v. Adili Chibuike Ejike: Illegally Importing Methamphetamine 10 May 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 May 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): GuiltyThe accused was found guilty on the charge he faced.
6	Lee Siew Boon Winston v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Force, Outraging Modesty, and Prosecution's Duty of Disclosure 29 Nov 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the application.
7	Public Prosecutor v AXR: Sexual Offences Against a Minor by Uncle 05 Oct 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	05 Oct 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted on all charges.
8	Arun Kaliamurthy v PP: Riot, Sub Judice Rule & Fair Trial 22 Jun 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Jun 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Costs awardedThe Public Prosecutor was awarded costs to be paid by the accused persons. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.