Sarah Thaker

Sarah Thaker is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sarah Thaker has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Accounts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Employment Agencies Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarah Thaker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sarah Thaker has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Lim Jun Yao Clarence v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Trading under Companies Act(Oct 2022) PP v Kidd: Falsification of Accounts & Sentencing Principles in Trading Losses(Oct 2020) Chong Kum Heng v Public Prosecutor: CBT and CDSA Offences & Sentencing Appeal(Jan 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sarah Thaker's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sarah Thaker's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Jun Yao Clarence v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Trading under Companies Act 09 Oct 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	09 Oct 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeal.
2	PP v Kidd: Falsification of Accounts & Sentencing Principles in Trading Losses 26 Oct 2020 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	26 Oct 2020	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
3	Chong Kum Heng v Public Prosecutor: CBT and CDSA Offences & Sentencing Appeal 29 Jan 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	29 Jan 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal against conviction upheld; appeal against sentence allowed in part.Appeal against conviction upheld; appeal against sentence allowed in part. Aggregate sentence reduced from 39 months to 32 months.