Sarah Yeo Qi Wei

Sarah Yeo Qi Wei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contractual terms and riddick principle. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Protection of contractual rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Directors Powers	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sarah Yeo Qi Wei has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WMH Law Corporation	3 cases	75% of cases	Tan Hong Joo v Full House Building Construction: Breach of Contract & Director's Reimbursement(Nov 2023) WQR v WQS: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Divorce(Sep 2023) Full House Building Construction v Tan Hong Joo: Breach of Contract & Director's Duties(Apr 2023)
Pereira & Tan LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Amber Pharmacy v Lim: Riddick Principle, Document Discovery & Criminal Investigations(Nov 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sarah Yeo Qi Wei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Partial	26.0 parties avg	6.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2023	34.6 parties avg	4.6

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sarah Yeo Qi Wei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	725,110.42	181,277.614 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Hong Joo v Full House Building Construction: Breach of Contract & Director's Reimbursement 27 Nov 2023 Ooi Chooi Teik (Appellant, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	27 Nov 2023	Ooi Chooi Teik (Appellant, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay $251,163.78 to Full House Building Construction Pte Ltd and $465,207.57 to Full House Building Construction Pte Ltd. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	WQR v WQS: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Divorce 28 Sep 2023 WQR (Plaintiff)Partial	28 Sep 2023	WQR (Plaintiff): Orders made for division of assetsThe Husband is to pay to the Wife the sum of S$473,946.64, being the S$1,093,695.39 which she loaned to the Husband for [E], less the [Condominium 1] maintenance fees of RM176,937.34 (converted to S$58,979.11 at RM3=S$1) and the Husband’s S$560,769.64 share of the matrimonial assets. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Full House Building Construction v Tan Hong Joo: Breach of Contract & Director's Duties 27 Apr 2023 Ooi Chooi Teik (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	27 Apr 2023	Ooi Chooi Teik (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Judgment against Defendant in partOrdered to pay $81,375.26 to Full House for the reimbursement claim, with interest at 5.33% per annum running from 24 April 2018 until payment in full. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Amber Pharmacy v Lim: Riddick Principle, Document Discovery & Criminal Investigations 17 Nov 2019 UrbanRx Compounding Pharmacy Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	17 Nov 2019	UrbanRx Compounding Pharmacy Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application allowed in partApplication allowed in part. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.