Sarala Subramaniam

Sarala Subramaniam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and constitutional law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sarala Subramaniam has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarala Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarala Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarala Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarala Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarala Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarala Subramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarala Subramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarala Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sarala Subramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarala Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarala Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Asset Management	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarala Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sarala Subramaniam has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	50% of cases	Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor: Constitutionality of Caning under Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2015)
Allen and Gledhill	1 cases	50% of cases	Dante Yap Go v Bank Austria: Discovery Application & Relevance to Pleadings(May 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sarala Subramaniam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sarala Subramaniam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,000.00	2,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor: Constitutionality of Caning under Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Mar 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Mar 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
2	Dante Yap Go v Bank Austria: Discovery Application & Relevance to Pleadings 08 May 2007 Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG (Defendant, Respondent)Won	08 May 2007	Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG (Defendant, Respondent): Application DismissedApplication for discovery of documents dismissed; costs of $2000 awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).