Sarjit Singh

Sarjit Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sarjit Singh has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in bankruptcy and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Bankruptcy	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy Discharge	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Libel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up of Companies	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sarjit Singh has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok	2 cases	33% of cases	Golden Shore Transportation v UCO Bank: Stay of Proceedings & Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause(Oct 2003) Motobayashi v Official Receiver: Abuse of Process & Estoppel in Foreign Bankruptcy(Jun 2000)
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	1 cases	17% of cases	ADP v ADT: Executors' Duties and Interim Distribution of Estate Assets Amid Mental Capacity Dispute(May 2014)
Insolvency & Public Trustee’s Office	1 cases	17% of cases	Jeyaretnam v Krishnan: Bankruptcy Discharge Application & Garnishment Validity(May 2007)
Official Assignee	1 cases	17% of cases	Jeyaretnam v Krishnan: Appeal Dismissed in Bankruptcy Discharge Case(Nov 2004)
OAPT	1 cases	17% of cases	Tohru Motobayashi v Official Receiver: Interpretation of s 377(3)(c) Companies Act on Winding Up of Foreign Company in Singapore(Oct 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sarjit Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Neutral	27.5 parties avg	7.5	33%
Won	33.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2007	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sarjit Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Neutral	2(33%)	33%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	233,255.78	77,751.933 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ADP v ADT: Executors' Duties and Interim Distribution of Estate Assets Amid Mental Capacity Dispute 29 May 2014 ADT and others (Defendant)Neutral	29 May 2014	ADT and others (Defendant): NeutralThe court made no order in respect of the originating summons.
2	Jeyaretnam v Krishnan: Bankruptcy Discharge Application & Garnishment Validity 31 May 2007 Official Assignee (Respondent)Neutral	31 May 2007	Official Assignee (Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, with a conditional discharge granted to the appellant upon payment of $233,255.78 to the Official Assignee.
3	Jeyaretnam v Krishnan: Appeal Dismissed in Bankruptcy Discharge Case 24 Nov 2004 Official Assignee (Other)Won	24 Nov 2004	Official Assignee (Other): Objection UpheldThe court's decision to refuse discharge from bankruptcy was in line with the Official Assignee's objections.
4	Golden Shore Transportation v UCO Bank: Stay of Proceedings & Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause 22 Oct 2003 UCO Bank (Respondent)Won	22 Oct 2003	UCO Bank (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
5	Tohru Motobayashi v Official Receiver: Interpretation of s 377(3)(c) Companies Act on Winding Up of Foreign Company in Singapore 30 Oct 2000 Official Receiver (Respondent)Lost	30 Oct 2000	Official Receiver (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the order below was set aside.
6	Motobayashi v Official Receiver: Abuse of Process & Estoppel in Foreign Bankruptcy 21 Jun 2000 Official Receiver (Defendant)Won	21 Jun 2000	Official Receiver (Defendant): Application DismissedThe application against the Official Receiver was dismissed.