Sasha Anselm Gonsalves

Sasha Anselm Gonsalves is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and civil practice. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and appellate practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Remuneration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unauthorised person acting as advocate or solicitor	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Presumption of fact in loans of money	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Discharge of Counsel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Official Assignee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Voluntary Arrangements	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sasha Anselm Gonsalves has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Legal Profession Act & Remuneration for Unauthorised Legal Services(Feb 2022) Crest Capital v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Consequential Orders and Costs After Appeal(May 2021) Aathar Ah Kong Andrew v OUE Lippo Healthcare Ltd: Striking Out Notice of Appeal & Discharge of Counsel(May 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sasha Anselm Gonsalves's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sasha Anselm Gonsalves's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	53,000.00	26,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Legal Profession Act & Remuneration for Unauthorised Legal Services 08 Feb 2022 Ding Pei Chai (Respondent, Defendant)Won	08 Feb 2022	Ding Pei Chai (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment in favour of RespondentChoo is to pay costs of $45,000 to Ding inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Crest Capital v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Consequential Orders and Costs After Appeal 23 May 2021 IHC Medical Re Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	23 May 2021	IHC Medical Re Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal Partially AllowedAppeal partially allowed; must pay costs fixed at $30,000 inclusive of disbursements to VMF3 and VMIII for the appeal.
3	Aathar Ah Kong Andrew v OUE Lippo Healthcare Ltd: Striking Out Notice of Appeal & Discharge of Counsel 09 May 2021 OUE Lippo Healthcare Ltd (Respondent)Won	09 May 2021	OUE Lippo Healthcare Ltd (Respondent): Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal Would Have Been AllowedCosts thrown away amounting to $8,000 for SUM 19 and SUM 125 to be paid by Mr. Aathar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).