Seah Ee Wei

Seah Ee Wei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 73.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated expertise across 38 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	8 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	7 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	7 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Freedom of assembly	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fundamental liberties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Newton hearings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voyeurism	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Health Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Excessive judicial interference	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Elements of crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unsound mind	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Seah Ee Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Seah Ee Wei has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	11 cases	100% of cases	Nicholas Tan v Public Prosecutor: Voyeurism, s377BB(4) Penal Code & Sentencing(Feb 2023) Saw Beng Chong v Public Prosecutor: Grievous Hurt Sentencing Appeal(Jul 2022) PP v Manta Equipment: Workplace Safety & Health Act - Employer's Duty & Sentencing(Jul 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Seah Ee Wei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	9%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	18%
Won	82.3 parties avg	2.3	73%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Seah Ee Wei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(9%)	9%
Partial	2(18%)	18%
Won	8(73%)	73%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	25,000.00	12,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2020	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nicholas Tan v Public Prosecutor: Voyeurism, s377BB(4) Penal Code & Sentencing 16 Feb 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	16 Feb 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially AllowedThe sentences imposed by the District Judge were set aside and substituted with a sentence of one week and three weeks’ imprisonment respectively, for an aggregate imprisonment of four weeks.
2	Saw Beng Chong v Public Prosecutor: Grievous Hurt Sentencing Appeal 20 Jul 2022 Public Prosecution (Respondent)Won	20 Jul 2022	Public Prosecution (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe respondent successfully defended the appeal against the 13-month imprisonment sentence.
3	PP v Manta Equipment: Workplace Safety & Health Act - Employer's Duty & Sentencing 06 Jul 2022 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	06 Jul 2022	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed.
4	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Public Prosecutor: Constitutionality of Public Order Act s 16(1)(a) and Freedom of Assembly 05 Nov 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	05 Nov 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Reference UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the constitutionality of s 16(1)(a) of the Public Order Act.
5	Mao Xuezhong v Public Prosecutor: Workplace Safety, Negligence, and Sentencing Under WSHA 19 May 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Won	19 May 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal against sentence allowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was increased to 12 months' imprisonment.
6	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Attorney-General: Contempt of Court & Freedom of Expression 15 Mar 2020 The Attorney-General (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	15 Mar 2020	The Attorney-General (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part regarding Wham, with a cease-publication injunction granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Gobi a/l Avedian v Attorney-General: Judicial Review & Equal Protection of Law 12 Feb 2020 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	12 Feb 2020	Attorney-General (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantApplications dismissed in favour of the Attorney-General.
8	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Unlawful Assembly & Refusal to Sign Statement 24 Oct 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	24 Oct 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed.
9	Anita Damu v Public Prosecutor: Mental Illness, Expert Evidence, and Admissibility 29 Sep 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Neutral	29 Sep 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Further directions to be givenThe court will hear the parties before giving further directions.
10	Chung Wan v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Voluntarily Causing Hurt 13 Aug 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Aug 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
11	SGB Starkstrom v Commissioner for Labour: Work Injury Compensation & Mental Capacity 20 Apr 2016 THE COMMISSIONER FOR LABOUR (Respondent)Won	20 Apr 2016	THE COMMISSIONER FOR LABOUR (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Commissioner's decision was upheld. Costs of $25,000 awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).