Seah Yong Quan Terence

Seah Yong Quan Terence is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in banking and finance and banking law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Aid	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Codicils	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pre-action discovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Seah Yong Quan Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Seah Yong Quan Terence has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Virtus Law LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	CSR v CSS: Pre-Action Discovery for Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Conspiracy(May 2022) Kathryn Ma v Trillion Investment: Winding Up Application Based on Just & Equitable Grounds(Apr 2018)
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Bank of China v Huang Ziqiang: Guarantee Enforcement & Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Loan Facility Revision(Nov 2014)
JWS Asia Law Corporation	1 cases	25% of cases	Lim Julian Frederick Yu v Lim Peng On: Will Interpretation & Beneficiary Qualification(Feb 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Seah Yong Quan Terence's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Seah Yong Quan Terence's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	66,838,374.08	66,838,374.081 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Julian Frederick Yu v Lim Peng On: Will Interpretation & Beneficiary Qualification 26 Feb 2024 Julian Frederick Yu Lim (Claimant)Lost	26 Feb 2024	Julian Frederick Yu Lim (Claimant): Claim DismissedClaim for 20% of the estate was dismissed as the claimant did not satisfy the Custody Care and Control Requirement in the Codicil.
2	CSR v CSS: Pre-Action Discovery for Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Conspiracy 08 May 2022 CSS (Respondent)Lost	08 May 2022	CSS (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Respondent's objections to the application for pre-action discovery were dismissed.
3	Kathryn Ma v Trillion Investment: Winding Up Application Based on Just & Equitable Grounds 17 Apr 2018 Kathryn Ma Wai Fong (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Apr 2018	Kathryn Ma Wai Fong (Plaintiff): Applications DismissedWinding up applications for Trillion Investment Pte Ltd, Double Ace Trading Company Pte Ltd, and Faxlink Trading Pte Ltd were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Bank of China v Huang Ziqiang: Guarantee Enforcement & Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Loan Facility Revision 19 Nov 2014 Huang Ziqiang (Defendant)Lost	19 Nov 2014	Huang Ziqiang (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; judgment entered against the defendant for US$66,838,374.08 together with further contractual interest. Assumed USD, as the loan was in USD.