Sean Say

Sean Say is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and undue influence. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sean Say has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sean Say has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Sean Say has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sean Say has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sean Say has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sean Say has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sean Say has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sean Say has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sean Say has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sean Say has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Judgments	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sean Say has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
False Representation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sean Say has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sean Say has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Non-Competition Clause	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sean Say has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sean Say has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sean Say has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
J Koh & Co	2 cases	67% of cases	KLW Holdings v SPH: Newspaper Rule & Pre-Trial Discovery in Libel Suit(Jul 2002) Barang Barang Pte Ltd v Boey Ng San: Non-Competition Clause & Summary Judgment(May 2002)
Keystone Law Corporation	1 cases	33% of cases	Chen Chun Kang v Zhao Meirong: Enforcement of Default Judgment & False Representation(Dec 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sean Say's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sean Say's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chen Chun Kang v Zhao Meirong: Enforcement of Default Judgment & False Representation 13 Dec 2011 Zhao Meirong (Defendant)Neutral	13 Dec 2011	Zhao Meirong (Defendant): Hearing AdjournedHearing of Summons adjourned to allow the Defendant a final opportunity to apply to set aside the Default Judgment.
2	KLW Holdings v SPH: Newspaper Rule & Pre-Trial Discovery in Libel Suit 15 Jul 2002 KLW Holdings Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	15 Jul 2002	KLW Holdings Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; KLW's application for pre-trial discovery was denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Barang Barang Pte Ltd v Boey Ng San: Non-Competition Clause & Summary Judgment 05 May 2002 Barang Barang Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	05 May 2002	Barang Barang Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for summary judgment was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.