Sean Tan Kim Kang

Sean Tan Kim Kang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	19% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 19% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Telecommunications Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Account of Profits	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Tapping	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sean Tan Kim Kang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sean Tan Kim Kang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	4 cases	100% of cases	Datacraft Asia v Kaufman: Stay of Proceedings Pending Japanese Court Decision on Breach of Contract(Jul 2007) SingTel v Starhub: Breach of Contract & Interpretation of Exclusion Clause in Network Lease Agreement(Feb 2006) SingTel v Starhub: Breach of Contract for Unauthorized Use of Leased Fibre Optic Network(Apr 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sean Tan Kim Kang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	24.7 parties avg	4.7	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sean Tan Kim Kang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Datacraft Asia v Kaufman: Stay of Proceedings Pending Japanese Court Decision on Breach of Contract 03 Jul 2007 Lisboa Ltd (Defendant)Won	03 Jul 2007	Lisboa Ltd (Defendant): Stay GrantedThe application for a stay of the Singapore proceedings was granted.
2	SingTel v Starhub: Breach of Contract & Interpretation of Exclusion Clause in Network Lease Agreement 05 Feb 2006 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Appellant)Won	05 Feb 2006	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs; judgment on liability entered in favor of SingTel and for damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	SingTel v Starhub: Breach of Contract for Unauthorized Use of Leased Fibre Optic Network 27 Apr 2005 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	27 Apr 2005	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Plaintiff; damages not recoverable due to Article 8.5(a). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Tan Liang Chong v Chou Lai Tiang: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Partnership Agreement 20 Oct 2003 Chou Lai Tiang (Defendant)Lost	20 Oct 2003	Chou Lai Tiang (Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay $13,500 for sundry creditor, $46,384.35 for undisclosed rental income, and $3,106.25 as share of estimated profits for 1999 to Tan Liang Chong and Tan Liang Teck (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).