See Chern Yang

See Chern Yang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 39 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and companies act. Their track record shows a 35.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 17 complex cases, representing 44% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

See Chern Yang has demonstrated expertise across 126 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	24 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 24 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	17 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	13 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	10 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prospect of Success	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common Intention Constructive Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scope of Works	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders’ dispute	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unless Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penalty Doctrine	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recusal of Judges	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non-party discovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Housing Loans	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Furniture Rebate Plan	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivative Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division of Property	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority shareholders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employees’ Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Directors	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Freight Forwarding	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pay	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lease Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Margin Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Crisis	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of duty of fidelity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Advice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defective Works	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rectification Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Futures Brokerage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Banking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Portfolio	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proper Plaintiff Rule	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraud on the Minority	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Directors and Officers Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Income Tax	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interrogatories	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Chern Yang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

See Chern Yang has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 21 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Premier Law LLC	21 cases	54% of cases	UNE v. UNF: Committal Order for Breach of Ancillary Matters Order Regarding Return of Personal Photographs(Apr 2019) Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation(Mar 2019) UNE v UNF: Enforcement of Matrimonial Asset Sale Order and Penal Notice Application(Oct 2018)
Drew & Napier LLC	12 cases	31% of cases	Biswas v Mukherjee: Extension of Time to Appeal Bankruptcy Order(Jan 2024) Mukherjee v Biswas: Bankruptcy Proceedings & Duty to Obtain Sanction of Official Assignee(Sep 2023) Tan Hui Min Sabrina Alberta v Chiang Hai Ding: Resulting & Constructive Trusts in Shophouse Ownership Dispute(Sep 2023)
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	5 cases	13% of cases	Go Dante Yap v Bank Austria: Investment Losses & Bank's Duty of Care(Aug 2010) Ting Sing Ning v Ting Chek Swee: Derivative Action, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Fraud on Minority Exception(Oct 2007) Asia Hotel Investments v Starwood: Breach of Contract & Lost Hotel Opportunity(Apr 2007)
Tan Kok Quan	1 cases	3% of cases	Dante Yap Go v Bank Austria: Discovery Application & Relevance to Pleadings(May 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of See Chern Yang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 17 (44%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	3%
Lost	164.0 parties avg	4.0	41%
Neutral	42.8 parties avg	2.8	10%
Partial	53.7 parties avg	3.7	13%
Won	144.3 parties avg	4.3	36%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2007	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2009	24.7 parties avg	4.7
2010	35.5 parties avg	5.5
2013	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	38.3 parties avg	8.3
2018	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	63.4 parties avg	3.4
2023	34.2 parties avg	4.2
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of See Chern Yang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(3%)	3%
Lost	16(40%)	40%
Neutral	4(10%)	10%
Partial	5(13%)	13%
Won	14(35%)	35%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	234,343,051.09	11,159,192.9121 cases	21
USD	10,199,553.12	5,099,776.562 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2013	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2018	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2019	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	6 1113	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (16.7%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 3 cases (50.0%)
2023	4 112	Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 39 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Biswas v Mukherjee: Extension of Time to Appeal Bankruptcy Order 30 Jan 2024 Gouri Mukherjee (Respondent)Won	30 Jan 2024	Gouri Mukherjee (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts awarded to the Respondents on an indemnity basis fixed at $12,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Mukherjee v Biswas: Bankruptcy Proceedings & Duty to Obtain Sanction of Official Assignee 14 Sep 2023 Gouri Mukherjee (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	14 Sep 2023	Gouri Mukherjee (Plaintiff, Respondent): Successful in opposing the appeals and applicationsAppeals and applications by Pradeepto Kumar Biswas dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tan Hui Min Sabrina Alberta v Chiang Hai Ding: Resulting & Constructive Trusts in Shophouse Ownership Dispute 13 Sep 2023 Chiang Joon Arn (Defendant)Won	13 Sep 2023	Chiang Joon Arn (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant in partThe court declared that the First Defendant holds 85.71% of the beneficial interest in the property on behalf of the Second Defendant under a resulting trust.
4	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation Dispute 02 Mar 2023 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	02 Mar 2023	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralThe judgment does not specify a direct outcome for DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
5	UOB v Lippo Marina: Unlawful Means Conspiracy & Deceit in Property Sale 27 Oct 2022 Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	27 Oct 2022	Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; Lippo is liable to pay damages to UOB, the quantum of which will be determined at the assessment of damages. UOB awarded 70% of the costs of the appeal which we assess to be $70,000. 70% of that is $49,000. This does not include disbursements of the appeal for which UOB claims $45,256.04 because of voluminous documents. However, a substantial part of the documents was not necessary for CA 67 as they were repeat documents which were common to the purchasers. UOB should have sought directions whether they could have used sample documents instead. In the circumstances, this court awards UOB $10,000 for disbursements of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Biswas v Mukherjees: Recusal Application and Appeal for Extension of Time 29 Sep 2022 Sabyasachi Mukherjee (Respondent)Won	29 Sep 2022	Sabyasachi Mukherjee (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts of S$12,000 for OA 2 and S$20,000 on an indemnity basis for SUM 15 awarded against the applicant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	DMX Technologies v Deloitte: Non-Party Discovery & Service Out of Jurisdiction 13 Sep 2022 DMX Technologies Group Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	13 Sep 2022	DMX Technologies Group Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Appeal Dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in respect of the AR’s decision in Summons 2154.
8	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Appeal 05 Jul 2022 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Neutral	05 Jul 2022	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): NeutralNeutral outcome. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	MKY Capital v MDR: Early Loan Repayment & Mortgage Redemption Dispute 27 Jun 2022 MKY Capital Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 Jun 2022	MKY Capital Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application AllowedPlaintiff's application to prepay the loan and redeem the mortgage with interest calculated up to 9 August 2021 was allowed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Biswas v Mukherjee: Retrial Application Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction & Abuse of Process 10 Apr 2022 Gouri Mukherjee (Respondent)Won	10 Apr 2022	Gouri Mukherjee (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication for a new trial was dismissed and indemnity costs of SGD 20,000 were awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	UOB v Lippo Marina: Deceit & Conspiracy in Housing Loans for Marina Collection Units 07 Dec 2021 Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	07 Dec 2021	Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claims DismissedAll claims against Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd were dismissed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
12	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Share Valuation 20 Dec 2020 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	20 Dec 2020	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralThe outcome for DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd is neutral, as it is the subject of the share valuation. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	UNE v. UNF: Committal Order for Breach of Ancillary Matters Order Regarding Return of Personal Photographs 16 Apr 2019 UNF (Defendant)Won	16 Apr 2019	UNF (Defendant): Application DismissedThe application for a committal order against the Husband was dismissed.
14	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 11 Mar 2019 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	11 Mar 2019	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim Allowed in PartInterlocutory judgment with damages to be assessed for DyStar against Kiri for breach of cll 15.1(a) and (b) of the SSSA. DyStar was entitled to 10% of the costs of its claim against Kiri. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
15	UNE v UNF: Enforcement of Matrimonial Asset Sale Order and Penal Notice Application 30 Oct 2018 UNF (Defendant)Neutral	30 Oct 2018	UNF (Defendant): No orders made on SUM 301.The court made no orders on SUM 301, regarding the application for a penal notice to be inserted in the Order, leaving it to the Wife to endorse the Order with a penal notice if she wishes to pursue that course.
16	Mukherjee Amitava v Dystar Global Holdings: Director's Right to Inspect Company Records under Companies Act 05 Sep 2018 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	05 Sep 2018	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed against the company. Costs awarded against the company in the aggregate sum of $30,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	UNE v UNF: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Long Marriage 07 Aug 2018 UNF (Defendant)Partial	07 Aug 2018	UNF (Defendant): Equal division of matrimonial assetsThe Husband was awarded 50% of the total pool of matrimonial assets, amounting to $10,651,711.33 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Mukherjee v DyStar: Director's Right to Inspect Company Records under Section 199 of the Companies Act 18 Dec 2017 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	18 Dec 2017	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantPlaintiff's application dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay costs of SGD 10,000. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	United Overseas Bank v Lippo Marina Collection: Discovery, Litigation & Without Prejudice Privilege 14 Jun 2017 Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	14 Jun 2017	Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application to discover Affidavit dismissedApplication for specific discovery of the Affidavit was dismissed on the ground of litigation privilege.
20	Antariksa Logistics v Nurdian Cuaca: Res Judicata & Striking Out Application 27 Mar 2017 D’LEAGUE PTE LTD (Defendant)Lost	27 Mar 2017	D’LEAGUE PTE LTD (Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; claims against this defendant stand. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore, as the judgment does not specify a currency.
21	Allplus Holdings v Phoon Wui Nyen: Enforceability of Settlement Agreement Clause as Penalty 21 Jul 2016 Phoon Wui Nyen (Pan Weiyuan) (Defendant, Appellant)Won	21 Jul 2016	Phoon Wui Nyen (Pan Weiyuan) (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the claim against the defendant was dismissed.
22	Schonk v Enholco: Breach of Employee Duties & Equitable Compensation 29 Nov 2015 International Oil and Gas Consultants Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	29 Nov 2015	International Oil and Gas Consultants Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal Dismissed in PartAppeal dismissed in part. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Enholco Pte Ltd v Schonk: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty, and Damages Assessment in Oil & Gas Industry 27 Apr 2015 International Oil and Gas Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Apr 2015	International Oil and Gas Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant): Damages to be paidDamages to be paid for breaches of contract and fidelity, trust and confidence. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Enholco Pte Ltd v Schonk: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Conflict of Interest in Oil & Gas Industry 03 Feb 2015 International Oil and Gas Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	03 Feb 2015	International Oil and Gas Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against the second defendant dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
25	Mohd Nizam v Comptroller: Income Tax Arrears & Statutory Demand Dispute 28 Jan 2014 Mohd Nizam B Ismail (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Jan 2014	Mohd Nizam B Ismail (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe plaintiff's application to set aside the statutory demand was dismissed.
26	Tan Chin Yew Joseph v Saxo Capital Markets: Margin Trading, Wrongful Close-Out of Futures Contracts 17 Dec 2013 Tan Chin Yew Joseph (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Dec 2013	Tan Chin Yew Joseph (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for damages was dismissed in its entirety.
27	UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Lease Renewal Dispute over Waterfront Redevelopment 06 Nov 2013 UDL Marine (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant)Lost	06 Nov 2013	UDL Marine (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant): Claims DismissedUDL Marine's claims against Jurong Town Corporation and Economic Development Board were dismissed. UDL Marine was ordered to pay Jurong Town Corporation $1,109,419.76 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	Ho Pak Kim Realty v Revitech: Construction Dispute over Kovan Primera Condominium 18 Feb 2013 Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	18 Feb 2013	Ho Pak Kim Realty Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedPlaintiff's appeal against the Assistant Registrar's decision was dismissed with costs to the defendant.
29	Lian Hwee Choo Phebe v Maxz Universal: Minority Oppression & Share Dilution 07 Sep 2010 Seeto Keong (Defendant)Lost	07 Sep 2010	Seeto Keong (Defendant): Adverse findingsAdverse findings made against Seeto Keong.
30	Go Dante Yap v Bank Austria: Investment Losses & Bank's Duty of Care 04 Aug 2010 Go Dante Yap (Plaintiff)Lost	04 Aug 2010	Go Dante Yap (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action was dismissed with costs to be taxed unless agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
31	Tam Tak Chuen v Eden Aesthetics: Derivative Action for Breach of Director's Duties 19 Jan 2010 KAR Pte Ltd (Other)Lost	19 Jan 2010	KAR Pte Ltd (Other): Application DeniedDr Khairul's application to wind up EA and EH was stayed.
32	Lanxess v APP Chemicals: Assignment of Debt & Civil Law Act 29 Jan 2009 APP Chemicals International (Mau) Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Jan 2009	APP Chemicals International (Mau) Ltd (Defendant): Claim AllowedThe court found that the debt was validly assigned to the plaintiff and the defendant is liable to pay the debt, contractual interest, and costs.
33	Lian Hwee Choo Phebe v Maxz Universal: Share Issuance, Articles of Association & Statutory Interpretation 12 Jan 2009 Wong Choon Hoy (Respondent)Won	12 Jan 2009	Wong Choon Hoy (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal against the individual was dismissed.
34	Lian Hwee Choo Phebe v Maxz Universal: Validity of Share Issuance Resolution under Companies Act 29 Jun 2008 Seeto Keong (Defendant)Won	29 Jun 2008	Seeto Keong (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantThe court ruled that the resolution did not contravene the Articles of Association of MDG. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
35	Ting Sing Ning v Ting Chek Swee: Derivative Action, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Fraud on Minority Exception 08 Oct 2007 Ting Sing Ning (alias Malcolm Ding) (Appellant)Won	08 Oct 2007	Ting Sing Ning (alias Malcolm Ding) (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appellant's appeal was allowed, granting him the right to pursue the derivative action.
36	Dante Yap Go v Bank Austria: Discovery Application & Relevance to Pleadings 08 May 2007 Dante Yap Go (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	08 May 2007	Dante Yap Go (Plaintiff, Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for discovery of documents dismissed; costs of $2000 awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
37	Asia Hotel Investments v Starwood: Breach of Contract & Lost Hotel Opportunity 09 Apr 2007 STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC (Defendant)Lost	09 Apr 2007	STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantOrdered to pay THB110,839,006 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) plus interest.
38	Ting Sing Ning v Ting Chek Swee: Locus Standi in Shareholder Fraud Claim 26 Oct 2006 Ting Sing Ning (alias Malcolm Ding) (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Oct 2006	Ting Sing Ning (alias Malcolm Ding) (Plaintiff): Action DismissedThe plaintiff's action was dismissed with costs to follow the event and to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
39	Richland Logistics v Biforst Singapore: Pre-Action Interrogatories & Arbitration Clause Dispute 30 Jul 2006 Richland Logistics Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	30 Jul 2006	Richland Logistics Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe plaintiff's appeal against the AR's decision was allowed.