See Hui Hui

See Hui Hui is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and personal injury. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

See Hui Hui has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in evidence law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Evidence Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Advice Privilege	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Litigation Privilege	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Foreign Worker Rights	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	See Hui Hui has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

See Hui Hui has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 cases	50% of cases	Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken v Asia Pacific Breweries: Legal Advice & Litigation Privilege in Fraud Investigation(May 2006)
Hoh Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Tan Woei Jinn v Thapjang Amorthap: Assessment of Damages for Foreign Worker's Injury(Mar 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of See Hui Hui's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of See Hui Hui's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	143,880.15	143,880.151 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken v Asia Pacific Breweries: Legal Advice & Litigation Privilege in Fraud Investigation 30 May 2006 Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Singapore Branch (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	30 May 2006	Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Singapore Branch (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe bank's appeal for production of the PWC Draft Reports was dismissed.
2	Tan Woei Jinn v Thapjang Amorthap: Assessment of Damages for Foreign Worker's Injury 15 Mar 2005 Tan Woei Jinn (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	15 Mar 2005	Tan Woei Jinn (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe award for pre-trial loss of earnings was adjusted to $32,190.15, and the award for loss of future earnings was adjusted to $111,690. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.